Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.
19952.7k citationsMichael Gibbons, Camille Limoges et al.profile →
Introduction: `Mode 2' Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge
2003716 citationsHelga Nowotny, Peter Scott et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Scott more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Scott. The network helps show where Peter Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Scott.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Scott based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Scott. Peter Scott is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Callender, Claire & Peter Scott. (2013). Browne and Beyond: Modernizing English Higher Education. Bedford Way Papers No. 42..1 indexed citations
5.
Scott, Peter & Claire Callender. (2013). Browne and Beyond: Modernizing English Higher Education. IOE EPrints.31 indexed citations
6.
Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, & Peter Scott. (2011). Revisiting Mode 2 at Noors Slott. Prometheus. 29(4).13 indexed citations
7.
Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, et al.. (2000). Rechtssoziologie „auf der Grenze“. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie. 21(2). 319–326.3 indexed citations
8.
Scott, Peter, et al.. (2000). University leadership : the role of the chief executive.81 indexed citations
9.
Smith, David A., et al.. (1999). New Leaders at the Top? The Educational and Career Paths of UK University Vice-Chancellors (1960-1996).. Higher education management. 11(2).6 indexed citations
10.
Scott, Peter. (1986). The Jarratt Report: A Commentary.. 10(1). 15–20.1 indexed citations
11.
Scott, Peter. (1985). Higher Education: The Next 20 Years.. 9(2). 195–208.1 indexed citations
Scott, Peter. (1958). Around the world in 103 days. Wildfowl (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust).1 indexed citations
20.
Scott, Peter. (1954). The Role of Northern Rhodesia in African Labour Migration. Geographical Review. 44(3). 432–434.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.