Countries citing papers authored by Mark Edward Phillips
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Edward Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Edward Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Edward Phillips more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Edward Phillips
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Edward Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Edward Phillips. The network helps show where Mark Edward Phillips may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Edward Phillips
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Edward Phillips.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Edward Phillips based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Edward Phillips. Mark Edward Phillips is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Phillips, Mark Edward, et al.. (2020). Using Metadata Record Graphs to Understand Digital Library Metadata. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 49–58.1 indexed citations
4.
Zavalina, Oksana L., et al.. (2017). An Exploratory Study of the Description Field in the Digital Public Library of America. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 34–44.2 indexed citations
Zavalina, Oksana L., et al.. (2016). A Case Study of Metadata Creation in the University of North Texas Libraries' Digital Collections. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).2 indexed citations
7.
Phillips, Mark Edward, et al.. (2015). An exploratory analysis of subject metadata in the digital public library of America. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 30–40.6 indexed citations
Phillips, Mark Edward, et al.. (2014). Enhancing Descriptive Metadata Records with Freely-Available APIs. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
10.
Zavalina, Oksana L., et al.. (2014). How descriptive metadata changes in the UNT libraries' collections: a case study. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 43–52.5 indexed citations
11.
Phillips, Mark Edward, et al.. (2014). Current Quality Assurance Practices in Web Archiving.5 indexed citations
12.
Phillips, Mark Edward. (2014). Reinventing Communication: How to Design, Lead and Manage High Performing Projects. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).5 indexed citations
13.
Phillips, Mark Edward. (2013). Metadata Analysis at the Command-Line. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.7 indexed citations
14.
Phillips, Mark Edward, et al.. (2013). Lessons learned in implementing the extended date/time format in a large digital library. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 60–70.3 indexed citations
Phillips, Mark Edward, et al.. (2011). PREMIS Event Service. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
18.
Phillips, Mark Edward. (2008). Using Archival Resource Keys (ARKs) for Persistent Identification. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
Jones, David, et al.. (1982). Raising Funds for ffPS. Oryx. 16(5). 459–461.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.