Thomas F. Gieryn
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.2%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 0.5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 1%
- Education top 1%
- Co-authors
- Peter WhalleyMichael MulkayNigel GilbertAnthony GiddensGerald HoltonJohn LawWiebe E. BijkerSteven Epstein
- Topics
- History of Science and Natural History (4 papers)Science and Climate Studies (3 papers)scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas F. Gieryn
51 papers receiving 7.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 194
- Sociology and Political Science 3.8k
- General Health Professions 784
- Political Science and International Relations 765
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 731
- Education 707
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas F. Gieryn
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas F. Gieryn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas F. Gieryn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas F. Gieryn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas F. Gieryn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas F. Gieryn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas F. Gieryn. The network helps show where Thomas F. Gieryn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas F. Gieryn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas F. Gieryn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas F. Gieryn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas F. Gieryn. Thomas F. Gieryn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 324 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 89 | |
| 13 | Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse.breakdown → | 1082 |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 143 | |
| 19 | 43 | |
| 20 | 161 |
About Thomas F. Gieryn
Thomas F. Gieryn is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, General Psychology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 57 papers that have together received 8.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Natural History (4 papers), Science and Climate Studies (3 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (602 citations), General Psychology (128 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (3.8k citations). Thomas F. Gieryn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Whalley, Michael Mulkay, Nigel Gilbert, Anthony Giddens, Gerald Holton, John Law, Wiebe E. Bijker, Steven Epstein, Susan E. Cozzens and Robert Κ. Merton. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.