Lukas van den Haak
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments 9
- Ureteral procedures and complications 2
- Gynecological conditions and treatments 2
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment 4
-
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques 5
- Surgical Simulation and Training 3
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 2
-
- Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues 1
- Co-authors
- Frank Willem JansenTheodoor E. NieboerJohann RhemrevMark E. VierhoutEvelien M. SandbergOlaf M. DekkersSarah L. CohenArnaud Wattiez
- Journals
- Annals of Surgery (1 paper)Fertility and Sterility (1 paper)BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Lukas van den Haak
13 papers receiving 383 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 280
- Reproductive Medicine 190
- Medical Laboratory Technology 27
- Surgery 132
- Pharmacology 47
Countries citing papers authored by Lukas van den Haak
This map shows the geographic impact of Lukas van den Haak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lukas van den Haak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lukas van den Haak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lukas van den Haak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lukas van den Haak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lukas van den Haak. The network helps show where Lukas van den Haak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lukas van den Haak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 86 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 106 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 68 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 9 |
About Lukas van den Haak
Lukas van den Haak is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Pharmacy, having authored 13 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (9 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (5 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (280 citations), Reproductive Medicine (190 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (27 citations). Lukas van den Haak has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Frank Willem Jansen, Theodoor E. Nieboer, Johann Rhemrev, Mark E. Vierhout, Evelien M. Sandberg, Olaf M. Dekkers, Sarah L. Cohen, Arnaud Wattiez, Sara Y. Brucker and Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, Fertility and Sterility and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.