T. Van den Bosch

7.1k total citations · 3 hit papers
127 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

T. Van den Bosch is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, T. Van den Bosch has authored 127 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 99 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 58 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 24 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in T. Van den Bosch's work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (59 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (58 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (50 papers). T. Van den Bosch is often cited by papers focused on Uterine Myomas and Treatments (59 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (58 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (50 papers). T. Van den Bosch collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Italy. T. Van den Bosch's co-authors include D. Timmerman, Dominique Van Schoubroeck, Gilbert Donders, Ine Riphagen, Gert Bellen, T. Bourne, Kristel Van Calsteren, Reinhilde Reybrouck, Bernard Spitz and Judith A.F. Huirne and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet Oncology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Human Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

T. Van den Bosch

115 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach

2020 248 citations Charles Chapron, Silvia Vannuccini et al. Human Reproduction Update profile →
Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure

2021 149 citations T. Van den Bosch, Robert A. de Leeuw et al. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology profile →
Strengths and limitations of diagnostic tools for endometriosis and relevance in diagnostic test accuracy research

2022 95 citations Jocelyn M. Wessels, M. K. Aas‐Eng et al. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
T. Van den Bosch Belgium	28	2.4k	1.6k	812	807	417	127	3.5k
Pentti K. Heinonen Finland	33	1.4k 0.6×	853 0.5×	323 0.4×	680 0.8×	458 1.1×	132	3.7k
Neena Malhotra India	25	516 0.2×	935 0.6×	441 0.5×	680 0.8×	102 0.2×	152	2.0k
G. Condous Australia	37	2.3k 1.0×	2.3k 1.4×	1.7k 2.1×	2.6k 3.3×	72 0.2×	280	5.2k
Dimitrios Nasioudis United States	27	625 0.3×	721 0.4×	105 0.1×	249 0.3×	525 1.3×	147	2.0k
Vatsla Dadhwal India	20	449 0.2×	229 0.1×	375 0.5×	349 0.4×	222 0.5×	139	1.4k
Akila Subramaniam United States	20	619 0.3×	119 0.1×	414 0.5×	281 0.3×	265 0.6×	151	1.3k
Ronni Gamzu Israel	28	416 0.2×	526 0.3×	577 0.7×	608 0.8×	247 0.6×	108	2.1k
Jatupol Srisomboon Thailand	22	653 0.3×	218 0.1×	177 0.2×	204 0.3×	904 2.2×	141	1.7k
George Makrydimas Greece	23	557 0.2×	98 0.1×	1.2k 1.5×	525 0.7×	778 1.9×	82	2.2k
Ashley S. Roman United States	24	1.3k 0.6×	71 0.0×	1.1k 1.3×	810 1.0×	422 1.0×	101	2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by T. Van den Bosch

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Van den Bosch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Van den Bosch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Van den Bosch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Van den Bosch

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Van den Bosch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Van den Bosch. The network helps show where T. Van den Bosch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Van den Bosch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Van den Bosch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Van den Bosch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. Van den Bosch. T. Van den Bosch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Bafort, Céline, Dominique Van Schoubroeck, Gábor Szabó, et al.. (2025). Ultrasound as a noninvasive diagnostic tool to detect deep endometriosis using the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis terminology. Fertility and Sterility.

Zhu, Lan, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo, Maribel Acién, et al.. (2025). Euro-Chinese consensus on accessory cavitated uterine malformation*,†. Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn. 17(2). 157–169.

Min, Nan, Robert A. de Leeuw, Lucet F. van der Voet, et al.. (2024). Structured hysteroscopic examination of uterine niches: a modified Delphi procedure. Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn. 16(3). 253–262. 1 indexed citations

Bruyn, C. De, Cristina Taliento, Anne‐Sophie Van Rompuy, et al.. (2024). Central necrosis in uterine sarcoma. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 64(6). 716–720. 1 indexed citations

Bosch, T. Van den, et al.. (2024). How to perform standardized sonographic examination of Cesarean scar pregnancy in the first trimester. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 64(3). 412–418. 2 indexed citations

Bordonné, Corinne, Judith A.F. Huirne, Lorraine Maitrot‐Mantelet, et al.. (2024). Focal what focal? — The diverse entities within focal adenomyosis. Pure Amsterdam UMC. 9. 100099–100099.

Min, Nan, Remco Visser, Nicole B. Burger, et al.. (2024). Prediction of vesicouterine adhesions by transvaginal sonographic sliding sign technique: validation study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 65(1). 114–121. 2 indexed citations

Heremans, Ruben, Laure Wynants, L. Valentin, et al.. (2023). Estimating risk of endometrial malignancy and other intracavitary uterine pathology in women without abnormal uterine bleeding using IETA‐1 multinomial regression model: validation study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 63(4). 556–563. 1 indexed citations

Guerriero, S., G. Condous, Martino Rolla, et al.. (2023). Addendum to consensus opinion from International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group: sonographic evaluation of the parametrium. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 64(2). 275–280. 10 indexed citations

10.

Fischerová, D., A. C. Testa, D. Franchi, et al.. (2023). Sonographic, Demographic, and Clinical Characteristics of Pre- and Postmenopausal Women with Endometrial Cancer; Results from a Post Hoc Analysis of the IETA4 (International Endometrial Tumor Analysis) Multicenter Cohort. Diagnostics. 14(1). 1–1.

11.

Wessels, Jocelyn M., M. K. Aas‐Eng, Maurício Simões Abrão, et al.. (2022). Strengths and limitations of diagnostic tools for endometriosis and relevance in diagnostic test accuracy research. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 60(3). 309–327. 95 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Wynants, Laure, Jan Y. Verbakel, L. Valentin, et al.. (2022). The Risk of Endometrial Malignancy and Other Endometrial Pathology in Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: An Ultrasound-Based Model Development Study by the IETA Group. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 87(1). 54–61. 7 indexed citations

13.

Jordans, I. P. M., T. Van den Bosch, D. Timmerman, et al.. (2022). How to perform standardized sonographic examination of uterine niche in non‐pregnant women. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 60(3). 420–424. 19 indexed citations

14.

Heremans, Ruben, T. Van den Bosch, L. Valentin, et al.. (2022). Ultrasound features of endometrial pathology in women without abnormal uterine bleeding: results from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis study (IETA3). Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 60(2). 243–255. 16 indexed citations

15.

Jordans, I. P. M., Robert A. de Leeuw, C. M. Bilardo, et al.. (2021). Definition and sonographic reporting system for Cesarean scar pregnancy in early gestation: modified Delphi method. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 59(4). 437–449. 64 indexed citations

16.

Leonardi, Mathew, Chuan Lü, S. Guerriero, et al.. (2020). OC19.03: Abstract withdrawn. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 56(S1). 54–54. 1 indexed citations

17.

Chapron, Charles, Silvia Vannuccini, Piétro Santulli, et al.. (2020). Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Human Reproduction Update. 26(3). 392–411. 248 indexed citations breakdown →

18.

Froyman, Wouter, T. Van den Bosch, Anne‐Sophie Van Rompuy, et al.. (2019). Juvenile cystic adenomyosis: A case report and review of the literature. Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 22(4). 295–300. 11 indexed citations

19.

Jordans, I. P. M., Robert A. de Leeuw, Sanne I. Stegwee, et al.. (2018). A practical guideline for examining a uterine niche using ultrasonography in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi method amongst European experts. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 3 indexed citations

20.

Timmermans, Anne, Brent C. Opmeer, Khalid S. Khan, et al.. (2010). Endometrial Thickness Measurement for Detecting Endometrial Cancer in Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 116(1). 160–167. 167 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact