Peter M. Schofield

9.5k total citations · 3 hit papers
114 papers, 6.9k citations indexed

About

Peter M. Schofield is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter M. Schofield has authored 114 papers receiving a total of 6.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 59 papers in Surgery, 54 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 29 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Peter M. Schofield's work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (25 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (16 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (14 papers). Peter M. Schofield is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (25 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (16 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (14 papers). Peter M. Schofield collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Peter M. Schofield's co-authors include Nigel Stephens, Frank J. Kelly, Sarah Clarke, A Parsons, Kevin H. Cheeseman, Matthew A. Brown, David J. Grainger, M C Petch, Jeremy K. Nicholson and Elaine Holmes and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and Circulation.

In The Last Decade

Peter M. Schofield

111 papers receiving 6.6k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Randomised controlled trial of vitamin E in patients with coronary disease: Cambridge Heart Antioxidant Study (CHAOS)

1996 1.6k citations Peter M. Schofield et al. profile →
Rapid and noninvasive diagnosis of the presence and severity of coronary heart disease using 1H-NMR-based metabonomics

2002 811 citations Sarah Clarke, Peter M. Schofield et al. Nature Medicine profile →
Association Between IVUS Findings and Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

2011 373 citations Patrick A. Calvert, Daniel R. Obaid et al. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter M. Schofield United Kingdom	35	2.1k	1.9k	1.6k	1.1k	1.0k	114	6.9k
C Kawai Japan	37	2.8k 1.3×	1.1k 0.6×	821 0.5×	577 0.5×	1.3k 1.2×	136	5.6k
Franco Cuccurullo Italy	52	2.6k 1.2×	1.8k 0.9×	1.5k 0.9×	444 0.4×	268 0.3×	193	9.1k
Andreas J. Flammer Switzerland	36	2.3k 1.1×	941 0.5×	849 0.5×	571 0.5×	921 0.9×	136	6.1k
H. Sinzinger Austria	36	1.1k 0.5×	1.3k 0.7×	798 0.5×	425 0.4×	475 0.5×	421	5.2k
Francesco Cipollone Italy	50	1.6k 0.8×	1.5k 0.8×	1.6k 1.0×	459 0.4×	283 0.3×	194	8.1k
Jacek Rysz Poland	52	2.7k 1.3×	2.8k 1.4×	1.9k 1.2×	404 0.4×	394 0.4×	360	10.3k
Thomas Heitzer Germany	30	2.8k 1.3×	916 0.5×	984 0.6×	582 0.5×	319 0.3×	47	6.7k
Joseph P. McConnell United States	42	2.0k 1.0×	3.0k 1.6×	1.4k 0.9×	307 0.3×	409 0.4×	109	7.9k
Giovanni Ciabattoni Italy	64	3.6k 1.7×	1.6k 0.9×	1.6k 1.0×	1.3k 1.2×	288 0.3×	169	12.0k
Göran Walldius Sweden	49	2.0k 1.0×	3.1k 1.6×	1.3k 0.8×	429 0.4×	329 0.3×	185	9.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter M. Schofield

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter M. Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter M. Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter M. Schofield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter M. Schofield

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter M. Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter M. Schofield. The network helps show where Peter M. Schofield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter M. Schofield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter M. Schofield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter M. Schofield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter M. Schofield. Peter M. Schofield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Calvert, Patrick A., Daniel R. Obaid, Michael O’Sullivan, et al.. (2011). Association Between IVUS Findings and Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 4(8). 894–901. 373 indexed citations breakdown →

Calvert, Patrick A., Daniel R. Obaid, Nick E.J. West, et al.. (2011). VIRTUAL HISTOLOGY INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND FINDINGS PREDICT ADVERSE OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: THE VIVA (VH-IVUS IN VULNERABLE ATHEROSCLEROSIS) STUDY. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 57(14). E2055–E2055. 1 indexed citations

Hoole, Stephen P., Sadia Khan, Paul A. White, et al.. (2009). Remote Ischaemic Pre-Conditioning Does Not Attenuate Ischaemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Humans. European Journal of Heart Failure. 11(5). 497–505. 31 indexed citations

Hoole, Stephen P., Patrick M. Heck, Linda Sharples, et al.. (2009). Cardiac Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Coronary Stenting (CRISP Stent) Study. Circulation. 119(6). 820–827. 340 indexed citations

Goldsmith, Kimberley, et al.. (2008). Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial. Trials. 9(1). 40–40. 18 indexed citations

Khan, Sadia, Duncan McNab, Linda Sharples, et al.. (2008). A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial. Trials. 9(1). 9–9. 3 indexed citations

Kirschenlohr, Heide L., Julian L. Griffin, Sarah Clarke, et al.. (2006). Proton NMR analysis of plasma is a weak predictor of coronary artery disease. Nature Medicine. 12(6). 705–710. 126 indexed citations

Gershlick, AH, Susan M. Hughes, Keith R. Abrams, et al.. (2005). for the REACT Trial Investigators. Rescue Angioplasty after Failed Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. 2758–2768. 35 indexed citations

Mosedale, David E., Duncan J. Smith, Sri W. Aitken, et al.. (2005). Circulating levels of MCP-1 and eotaxin are not associated with presence of atherosclerosis or previous myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis. 183(2). 268–274. 29 indexed citations

10.

Satchithananda, Duwarakan, Șerban Stoica, Paul A. White, et al.. (2001). Systolic right ventricular dysfunction in ‘good’ donor hearts- a normal finding?. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 20(2). 243–243. 3 indexed citations

11.

Campbell, Helen, Sue Tait, Martin Buxton, et al.. (2001). A UK trial-based cost–utility analysis of transmyocardial laser revascularization compared to continued medical therapy for treatment of refractory angina pectoris. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 20(2). 312–318. 18 indexed citations

12.

Hildick‐Smith, David, Martin Löwe, Peter M. Schofield, et al.. (1998). Ventricular pacemaker upgrade: experience, complications and recommendations. Heart. 79(4). 383–387. 24 indexed citations

13.

Burns, Sharon M, et al.. (1998). Measurement of myocardial blood flow using positron emission tomography before and after transmyocardial revascularization. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 31(19 Suppl). 226–226. 39 indexed citations

14.

Smith, Julian A., Matthew J. Roberts, K. McNeil, et al.. (1996). Excellent outcome of cardiac transplantation using domino donor hearts. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 10(8). 628–633. 12 indexed citations

15.

Sharples, Linda, Matthew J. Roberts, J. Parameshwar, et al.. (1995). Heart transplantation in the United Kingdom: who waits longest and why.. PubMed. 14(2). 236–43. 10 indexed citations

16.

Brack, M J, Simon Ray, Anoop Chauhan, et al.. (1995). The subcutaneous heparin and angioplasty restenosis prevention (SHARP) trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 26(4). 947–954. 47 indexed citations

17.

Chauhan, Anoop, et al.. (1993). Validation study of a Doppler-tipped angiographic catheter for measurement of coronary flow reserve. The American Journal of Cardiology. 71(12). 1119–1121. 3 indexed citations

18.

Mullins, Paul A., et al.. (1991). Small vessel coronary occlusive disease after cardiac transplantation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 17(2). A308–A308. 3 indexed citations

19.

Ramsdale, David R. & Peter M. Schofield. (1989). Endomyocardial trauma during balloon mitral valvuloplasty. American Heart Journal. 117(3). 685–687. 2 indexed citations

20.

Edwards, Joseph & Peter M. Schofield. (1984). Myocardial depression in streptococcal cellulitis.. BMJ. 288(6420). 816–817. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact