Sue Tait

569 total citations
7 papers, 385 citations indexed

About

Sue Tait is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Sue Tait has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 385 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 5 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Sue Tait's work include Pain Management and Treatment (6 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Sue Tait is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Treatment (6 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Sue Tait collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Sue Tait's co-authors include Linda Sharples, N Caine, Sharon M Burns, Martin Buxton, J. Wallwork, T Wistow, P M Schofield, Peter M. Schofield, Carol Freeman and Duncan McNab and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, European Heart Journal and The American Journal of Cardiology.

In The Last Decade

Sue Tait

7 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sue Tait United Kingdom	7	233	163	146	133	41	7	385
Liyew Desta Sweden	10	35 0.2×	91 0.6×	251 1.7×	62 0.5×	24 0.6×	22	335
Giampaolo Trevi Italy	7	57 0.2×	31 0.2×	221 1.5×	28 0.2×	29 0.7×	16	303
Madhav Menon New Zealand	7	32 0.1×	132 0.8×	220 1.5×	191 1.4×	5 0.1×	13	298
Enrique V. Carbajal United States	11	15 0.1×	117 0.7×	478 3.3×	255 1.9×	6 0.1×	21	564
Didier Morau France	10	91 0.4×	424 2.6×	90 0.6×	61 0.5×	10 0.2×	18	462
Parantap Patel United States	5	23 0.1×	172 1.1×	99 0.7×	42 0.3×	9 0.2×	9	285
Constantine L. Karras United States	9	24 0.1×	109 0.7×	17 0.1×	12 0.1×	20 0.5×	48	309
Başar Erdivanlı Türkiye	8	63 0.3×	91 0.6×	33 0.2×	14 0.1×	17 0.4×	43	217
Kjell Ahlén United States	10	143 0.6×	377 2.3×	107 0.7×	14 0.1×	10 0.2×	11	558
Antonio Medici Italy	12	10 0.0×	241 1.5×	144 1.0×	99 0.7×	17 0.4×	35	427

Countries citing papers authored by Sue Tait

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sue Tait's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sue Tait with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sue Tait more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sue Tait

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sue Tait. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sue Tait. The network helps show where Sue Tait may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sue Tait

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sue Tait. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sue Tait based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sue Tait. Sue Tait is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

McNab, Duncan, Sadia Khan, Linda Sharples, et al.. (2006). An open label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial. European Heart Journal. 27(9). 1048–1053. 68 indexed citations

2.

Campbell, Helen, Sue Tait, Linda Sharples, et al.. (2005). Trial-based cost-utility comparison of percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation and continued medical therapy for treatment of refractory angina pectoris. The European Journal of Health Economics. 6(4). 288–297. 7 indexed citations

3.

Gray, Timothy, Sharon M Burns, Sarah Clarke, et al.. (2003). Percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris. The American Journal of Cardiology. 91(6). 661–666. 24 indexed citations

4.

Campbell, Helen, Sue Tait, Martin Buxton, et al.. (2001). A UK trial-based cost–utility analysis of transmyocardial laser revascularization compared to continued medical therapy for treatment of refractory angina pectoris. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 20(2). 312–318. 18 indexed citations

5.

Burns, Sharon M, et al.. (2001). Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion changes with transmyocardial laser revascularization. The American Journal of Cardiology. 87(7). 861–867. 14 indexed citations

6.

Sharples, Linda, Chris Todd, N Caine, & Sue Tait. (2000). Measurement properties of the Nottingham Health Profile and Short Form 36 health status measures in a population sample of elderly people living at home: Results from ELPHS. British Journal of Health Psychology. 5(3). 217–233. 23 indexed citations

7.

Schofield, P M, Linda Sharples, N Caine, et al.. (1999). Transmyocardial laser revascularisation in patients with refractory angina: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 353(9152). 519–524. 231 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact