Peter Kurdi

681 total citations
10 papers, 542 citations indexed

About

Peter Kurdi is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Food Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Kurdi has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 542 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics, 5 papers in Food Science and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Peter Kurdi's work include Probiotics and Fermented Foods (5 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (3 papers) and Food composition and properties (2 papers). Peter Kurdi is often cited by papers focused on Probiotics and Fermented Foods (5 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (3 papers) and Food composition and properties (2 papers). Peter Kurdi collaborates with scholars based in Thailand, Japan and Netherlands. Peter Kurdi's co-authors include Atsushi Yokota, K Mizutani, Hendrik W. van Veen, Chanida Hansawasdi, Wil N. Konings, Fusao Tomita, Kozo Asano, Ruud Valyasevi, Hiroshi Tanaka and Gerald W. Tannock and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Microbiology and LWT.

In The Last Decade

Peter Kurdi

10 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Kurdi Thailand	9	313	208	114	107	73	10	542
Teruaki Iwasaki Japan	11	354 1.1×	245 1.2×	75 0.7×	176 1.6×	71 1.0×	17	669
Myung Jun Chung South Korea	12	348 1.1×	260 1.3×	45 0.4×	121 1.1×	27 0.4×	30	588
Yvonne Clune Ireland	6	522 1.7×	280 1.3×	99 0.9×	233 2.2×	78 1.1×	7	760
Samira Boudebbouze France	16	558 1.8×	329 1.6×	28 0.2×	134 1.3×	97 1.3×	26	871
Kimiko Minamida Japan	12	268 0.9×	177 0.9×	30 0.3×	197 1.8×	48 0.7×	14	571
Gift Chiwala China	8	288 0.9×	123 0.6×	51 0.4×	34 0.3×	39 0.5×	12	451
Mercedes Ortega‐González Spain	9	302 1.0×	113 0.5×	22 0.2×	153 1.4×	90 1.2×	9	569
Damiana Diniz Rosa Brazil	10	421 1.3×	392 1.9×	31 0.3×	189 1.8×	46 0.6×	17	750
Kim Hodges United States	10	328 1.0×	102 0.5×	44 0.4×	103 1.0×	129 1.8×	13	750
Nadine De Keyser Belgium	11	255 0.8×	188 0.9×	21 0.2×	185 1.7×	56 0.8×	17	569

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kurdi

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kurdi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kurdi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kurdi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kurdi

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kurdi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kurdi. The network helps show where Peter Kurdi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Kurdi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Kurdi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Kurdi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Kurdi. Peter Kurdi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Kurdi, Peter, et al.. (2021). Studies on Microbial Quality, Protein Yield, and Antioxidant Properties of Some Frozen Edible Insects. International Journal of Food Science. 2021. 1–7. 25 indexed citations

2.

Hansawasdi, Chanida & Peter Kurdi. (2017). Potential Prebiotic Oligosaccharide Mixtures from Acidic Hydrolysis of Rice Bran and Cassava Pulp. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 72(4). 396–403. 8 indexed citations

3.

Kurdi, Peter & Chanida Hansawasdi. (2015). Assessment of the prebiotic potential of oligosaccharide mixtures from rice bran and cassava pulp. LWT. 63(2). 1288–1293. 27 indexed citations

4.

Srimarut, Yanee, et al.. (2012). Systematic identification of Lactobacillus plantarum auxotrophs for fermented Nham using genome-scale metabolic model. Journal of Biotechnology. 162(2-3). 327–335. 1 indexed citations

5.

Valyasevi, Ruud, et al.. (2010). Isolation and characterization of acid-sensitive Lactobacillus plantarum with application as starter culture for Nham production. Food Microbiology. 27(6). 741–748. 23 indexed citations

6.

Kurdi, Peter, et al.. (2008). Isolation and characterization of acid-sensitive mutants of Pediococcus acidilactici. Food Microbiology. 26(1). 82–87. 9 indexed citations

7.

Kurdi, Peter, et al.. (2006). Mechanism of Growth Inhibition by Free Bile Acids in Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria. Journal of Bacteriology. 188(5). 1979–1986. 287 indexed citations

8.

Kurdi, Peter, Hiroshi Tanaka, Hendrik W. van Veen, et al.. (2003). Cholic acid accumulation and its diminution by short-chain fatty acids in bifidobacteria. Microbiology. 149(8). 2031–2037. 55 indexed citations

9.

Yokota, Atsushi, et al.. (2000). Cholate Resistance in Lactococcus lactis Is Mediated by an ATP-Dependent Multispecific Organic Anion Transporter. Journal of Bacteriology. 182(18). 5196–5201. 58 indexed citations

10.

Kurdi, Peter, Hendrik W. van Veen, Hiroshi Tanaka, et al.. (2000). Cholic Acid Is Accumulated Spontaneously, Driven by Membrane ΔpH, in Many Lactobacilli. Journal of Bacteriology. 182(22). 6525–6528. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact