Peter Knief

1.1k citations
15 papers · 918 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Knief

15 papers receiving 882 citations

Peers

Peter Knief
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Biophysics 656
  • Analytical Chemistry 512
  • Insect Science 104
  • Pharmaceutical Science 42
  • Automotive Engineering 79
Replace Abdullah Talari with:
Abdullah Talari United Kingdom
Linda H. Kidder United States
Surya Pratap Singh India
Jennifer Dorney United Kingdom
Karsten Rebner Germany
С. А. Гончуков Russia
Susie Boydston‐White United States
Rolf Wolthuis Netherlands
Patrick M. Mehl United States
Yongzeng Li China
Peter Knief relative to Abdullah Talari United Kingdom Abdullah Talari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19.8×
Abdullah Talari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Knief

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Knief's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Knief with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Knief more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Knief

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Knief. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Knief. The network helps show where Peter Knief may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Knief, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Knief Line = papers co-authored together Peter Knief links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2007199
2 2015158
3 2006101
4 201064
5 202063
6 202162
7 201259
8 201255
9 201055
10 200947
11 201434
12 20108
13 20105
14 20185
15 20093

About Peter Knief

Peter Knief is a scholar working on Biophysics, Analytical Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Automotive Engineering and Insect Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 918 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (12 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (11 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (2 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (2 papers), Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques (2 papers), Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (2 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (2 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (656 citations), Analytical Chemistry (512 citations), Insect Science (104 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (42 citations) and Automotive Engineering (79 citations). Peter Knief has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Hugh J. Byrne, Fiona M. Lyng, Aidan D. Meade, Franck Bonnier, Mark Keating, Brendan Duffy, Jennifer Conroy, P. Kelehan, Aikaterini Lalatsa and Anne Marie Healy. Their work appears in journals such as The Analyst, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Chemical Society Reviews, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy and International Journal of Pharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact