Peter K. Panegyres
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Neurology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Physiology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey M. RogersHuei-Yang ChenFrank MastagliaJennifer BurchellVictoria A. FabianAnna JarmolowiczWally KnezevicP. J. Zilko
- Topics
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (33 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (27 papers)Neurological diseases and metabolism (13 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter K. Panegyres
105 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
- Molecular Biology 783
- Neurology 775
- Psychiatry and Mental health 649
- Physiology 631
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 558
Countries citing papers authored by Peter K. Panegyres
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter K. Panegyres's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter K. Panegyres with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter K. Panegyres more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter K. Panegyres
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter K. Panegyres. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter K. Panegyres. The network helps show where Peter K. Panegyres may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter K. Panegyres
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter K. Panegyres. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter K. Panegyres based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter K. Panegyres. Peter K. Panegyres is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 161 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 61 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 182 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Peter K. Panegyres
Peter K. Panegyres is a scholar working on Neurology, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 106 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (33 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (27 papers) and Neurological diseases and metabolism (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (775 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (649 citations) and Neurology (339 citations). Peter K. Panegyres has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey M. Rogers, Huei-Yang Chen, Frank Mastaglia, Jennifer Burchell, Victoria A. Fabian, Anna Jarmolowicz, Wally Knezevic, P. J. Zilko, Merrilee Needham and Jane S. Paulsen. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.