John D. Port
Impact in
- Neurology top 2%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Papers in
- Neurology 11
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 7
- Co-authors
- Jonathan S. AbramowitzStephen P. WhitesideMartin G. PomperN.J. BeauchampL.A. BeneventoIan R. LanzaStephen P. H. WhitesidePaul E. Croarkin
- Journals
- Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (7 papers)American Journal of Neuroradiology (5 papers)Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (4 papers)Diagnostic Cytopathology (3 papers)The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaItaly
In The Last Decade
John D. Port
109 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- Neurology 344
- Cognitive Neuroscience 778
- Biological Psychiatry 87
- Psychiatry and Mental health 503
- Neurology 499
Countries citing papers authored by John D. Port
This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Port's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Port with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Port more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Port
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Port. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Port. The network helps show where John D. Port may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John D. Port, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 62 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 104 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 53 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 29 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 14 |
About John D. Port
John D. Port is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 114 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (21 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (8 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (7 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (6 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (344 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (778 citations), Biological Psychiatry (87 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (503 citations) and Neurology (499 citations). John D. Port has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan S. Abramowitz, Stephen P. Whiteside, Martin G. Pomper, N.J. Beauchamp, L.A. Benevento, Ian R. Lanza, Stephen P. H. Whiteside, Paul E. Croarkin, Andrés Acosta and Nivedita Agarwal. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging, American Journal of Neuroradiology, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diagnostic Cytopathology and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.