Peter John Cabot

90 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Peter John Cabot
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Sensory Systems 290
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 975
  • Physiology 1.0k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 219
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 483
Replace Yoshinori Itoh with:
Yoshinori Itoh Japan
Francesca Rossi Italy
Daniel P. Poole Australia
Liping Zhang China
Christoph H. Gleiter Germany
Emmanuel Naline France
Antonio Di Stefano Italy
Roberto Fantozzi Italy
Jcw Mak Hong Kong
Peter John Cabot relative to Yoshinori Itoh Japan Yoshinori Itoh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Yoshinori Itoh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter John Cabot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter John Cabot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter John Cabot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter John Cabot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter John Cabot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter John Cabot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter John Cabot. The network helps show where Peter John Cabot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter John Cabot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter John Cabot Line = papers co-authored together Peter John Cabot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997264
2 2011149
3 2002148
4 2013148
5 1998145
6 2001137
7 2019109
8 2012101
9 200693
10 201793
11 201289
12 201683
13 201982
14 201778
15 201777
16 201170
17 202270
18 201066
19 200164
20
Endogenous opioid analgesia in peripheral tissues and the clinical implications for pain control.
200564

About Peter John Cabot

Peter John Cabot is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmaceutical Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (26 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (25 papers), Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (13 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (8 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (7 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (6 papers) and Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (290 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (975 citations), Physiology (1.0k citations), Pharmaceutical Science (219 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (483 citations). Peter John Cabot has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marie‐Odile Parat, Irina Vetter, Christoph Stein, Gregory Raymond Monteith, Banafsheh Afsharimani, Richard James Lewis, Sarah J. Roberts‐Thomson, Michael Schaefer, Seyed Ebrahim Alavi and Maree T. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Journal of Pain and Pharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact