Emmanuel Naline
Impact in
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Sensory Systems top 1%
Papers in
- Physiology 68
- Asthma and respiratory diseases 63
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 40
- Co-authors
- Charles AdvenierPhilippe DevillierStanislas Grassin‐DelyleXavier Emonds‐AltChristophe FaisyD. RegoliMathiéu MolimardHélène Salvator
In The Last Decade
Emmanuel Naline
162 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.5k
- Sensory Systems 368
- Physiology 1.9k
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 353
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Emmanuel Naline
This map shows the geographic impact of Emmanuel Naline's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emmanuel Naline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emmanuel Naline more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emmanuel Naline
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emmanuel Naline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emmanuel Naline. The network helps show where Emmanuel Naline may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emmanuel Naline, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 81 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 33 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 25 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 46 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 85 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 86 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 47 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 21 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 40 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 57 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 4 |
About Emmanuel Naline
Emmanuel Naline is a scholar working on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Sensory Systems and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 162 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asthma and respiratory diseases (63 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (40 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (33 papers), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (25 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (17 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (13 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (12 papers) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Sensory Systems (368 citations), Physiology (1.9k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (353 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.2k citations). Emmanuel Naline has collaborated with scholars based in France, Spain and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Charles Advenier, Philippe Devillier, Stanislas Grassin‐Delyle, Xavier Emonds‐Alt, Christophe Faisy, D. Regoli, Mathiéu Molimard, Hélène Salvator, P. Vilain and J. C. Brelière. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Pharmacology, European Journal of Pharmacology, European Respiratory Journal, Respiratory Research and American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.