Péter Jacsó
Impact in
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Information Systems top 1%
- Web visibility and informetrics
- Research Data Management Practices
- Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Web Data Mining and Analysis
Papers in
-
- Information Retrieval and Search Behavior 14
- Web visibility and informetrics 11
- Research Data Management Practices 10
- Web Data Mining and Analysis 8
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 5
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research 35
Péter Jacsó
86 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 952
- Information Systems 735
- Library and Information Sciences 48
- Information Systems and Management 209
- History and Philosophy of Science 117
Countries citing papers authored by Péter Jacsó
This map shows the geographic impact of Péter Jacsó's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Péter Jacsó with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Péter Jacsó more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Péter Jacsó
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Péter Jacsó. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Péter Jacsó. The network helps show where Péter Jacsó may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Péter Jacsó, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 280 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 149 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 127 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 101 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 94 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 76 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 63 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 55 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 55 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 53 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 52 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 48 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 47 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 44 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 40 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 38 | |
| 17 | Content Evaluation of Databases. | 1997 | 36 |
| 18 | 2012 | 35 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 33 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 28 |
About Péter Jacsó
Péter Jacsó is a scholar working on Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems and Management, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (35 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (14 papers), Web visibility and informetrics (11 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (11 papers), Research Data Management Practices (10 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (8 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (6 papers) and Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (952 citations), Information Systems (735 citations), Library and Information Sciences (48 citations), Information Systems and Management (209 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (117 citations). Péter Jacsó has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Carol Tenopir and F. W. Lancaster. Their work appears in journals such as Online Information Review, Scientometrics, Computers in libraries, El Profesional de la Informacion and The Electronic Library.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.