Online Information Review

1.8k papers and 30.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Online Information Review in the last decades have received a total of 30.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Online Information Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (613 papers), Information Systems (478 papers) and Communication (415 papers) specifically the topics of Digital Marketing and Social Media (320 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (235 papers) and Social Media and Politics (214 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Online Information Review are Péter Jacsó, David Stuart, Hsin Hsin Chang, Andreas Holzinger, Rowena Cullen, Mike Thelwall, Carlos Flavián, Juan Luis Gandía Cabedo, Surithong Srisa‐ard and Frank Parry.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Online Information Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Online Information Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Online Information Review.

Countries where authors publish in Online Information Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Online Information Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Online Information Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Online Information Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025