Peter J. Laud

24 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peter J. Laud's Hit Papers

Ceftazidime-avibactam versus meropenem in nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (REPROVE): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial 2017 · 373 citations
3730+3+6Years since publication100200300

Peers

Peter J. Laud
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Molecular Medicine 585
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 194
  • Neurology 279
  • Pharmacology 367
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 81
Replace Aryun Kim with:
Aryun Kim South Korea
Chiara Adembri Italy
Roberto Imberti Italy
Hongke Zeng China
Eric Sampane-Donkor Ghana
Niels Tønder Denmark
Kurt Rasche Germany
Koji Hosokawa Japan
Chung‐Kan Peng Taiwan
Purificación Ros Spain
Peter J. Laud relative to Aryun Kim South Korea Aryun Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Aryun Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Laud

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Laud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Laud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Laud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Laud

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Laud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Laud. The network helps show where Peter J. Laud may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Laud, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Laud Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Laud links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Ceftazidime-avibactam versus meropenem in nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (REPROVE): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial
Hit paper breakdown →
2017373
2 2016363
3 2018241
4 2004131
5 2019118
6 2017114
7 201287
8 201951
9 201640
10 202039
11 201926
12 201724
13 200520
14 202119
15 201413
16 200512
17 201810
18 20237
19 20175
20 20185

About Peter J. Laud

Peter J. Laud is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Statistics and Probability, Urology, Oncology and Neurology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (3 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (3 papers), Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research (2 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (2 papers), Hair Growth and Disorders (2 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (585 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (194 citations), Neurology (279 citations), Pharmacology (367 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (81 citations). Peter J. Laud has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Leanne B. Gasink, Angela Wardman, Greg G. Stone, Yehuda Carmeli, Paul A. Newell, Jon M. Armstrong, Arshad Majid, Joseph W. Chow, Jie Song and Gregory G. Stone. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmaceutical Statistics, The Lancet Infectious Diseases, British Journal of Cancer, PLoS ONE and International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact