Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Colonization, Succession and Stability.
1988904 citationsPeter J. Edwards et al.Journal of Ecologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Edwards
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Edwards's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Edwards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Edwards more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Edwards
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Edwards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Edwards. The network helps show where Peter J. Edwards may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter J. Edwards
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter J. Edwards.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter J. Edwards based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter J. Edwards. Peter J. Edwards is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Baur, Bruno, Peter Duelli, Peter J. Edwards, et al.. (2004). Biodiversität in der Schweiz - Zustand, Erhaltung, Perspektiven. Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen für eine nationale Strategie. DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research).2 indexed citations
5.
Güsewell, Sabine, et al.. (2003). Impacts of soil conditions and agricultural land use on plant species richness of Alpine pastures in the south of Glarus (Switzerland). 113(1). 15–36.8 indexed citations
6.
Edwards, Peter J., et al.. (2003). Invasion of woody plants into the Seychelles tropical forests: habitat invasibility and propagule pressure.. 69. 65–75.1 indexed citations
Edwards, Peter J., Johannes Kollmann, David Wood, & J. M. Lenné. (1999). Determinants of agrobiodiversity in the agricultural landscape.. 183–210.5 indexed citations
Hanley, Michael E., M. Fenner, & Peter J. Edwards. (1996). Mollusc grazing and seedling survivorship of four common grassland plant species : the role of gap size, species and season. Acta Oecologica. 17(4). 331–341.37 indexed citations
12.
Boatman, N. D., et al.. (1990). Strategies for the conservation of endangered arable weeds in Great Britain.. 93–101.3 indexed citations
Tainton, N.M., Peter J. Edwards, & M.T. Mentis. (1980). A revised method for assessing veld condition. Proceedings of the Annual Congresses of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa. 15(1). 37–42.81 indexed citations
18.
Edwards, Peter J., et al.. (1977). French: Language and Life Styles. Modern Language Journal. 61(4). 211–211.2 indexed citations
Edwards, Peter J.. (1965). The construction and use of light-proof boxes in grassland research work..15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.