M.T. Mentis

38 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

M.T. Mentis
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Forestry 146
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 395
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 227
  • Ecology 362
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 118
Replace J. C. Tothill with:
J. C. Tothill Australia
Raphael Ben-Shahar United Kingdom
N.M. Tainton South Africa
Brien E. Norton United States
Lynne Torvell United Kingdom
N. Zambatis South Africa
C.A.D.M. van de Vijver Netherlands
Feetham F. Banyikwa Tanzania
Jacqui Stol Australia
C. Levassor Spain
M.T. Mentis relative to J. C. Tothill Australia J. C. Tothill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
J. C. Tothill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.T. Mentis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.T. Mentis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.T. Mentis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.T. Mentis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.T. Mentis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.T. Mentis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.T. Mentis. The network helps show where M.T. Mentis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside M.T. Mentis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.T. Mentis Line = papers co-authored together M.T. Mentis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199092
2 198081
3 198153
4
Description of the Grassland Biome Project
198239
5 198938
6 199033
7 198829
8 198929
9 198328
10 198225
11
Monitoring in South African grasslands
198422
12 199120
13 198019
14 198618
15 198117
16 199016
17
Stocking rates and carrying capacities for ungulates on African rangelands
197715
18 198815
19 197913
20 199313

About M.T. Mentis

M.T. Mentis is a scholar working on Forestry, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Archeology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (12 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (9 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (9 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (6 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (4 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (146 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (395 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (227 citations), Ecology (362 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (118 citations). M.T. Mentis has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Singapore and Canada. Frequent co-authors include N.M. Tainton, Robert J. Scholes, Andrew Blackmore, Peter J. Edwards, Arthur W. Bailey, R. C. Bigalke, Greg Stuart‐Hill, Charlie M. Shackleton, D.T. Rowe-Rowe and Mark G. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as African Journal of Wildlife Research, South African Journal of Science, Journal of Biogeography, Functional Ecology and Biological Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026