Peter Glasner
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
-
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 14
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions 2
-
- Biotechnology and Related Fields 4
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 7
- Religion, Society, and Development 3
-
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 6
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 4
-
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations 5
- Co-authors
- Paul AtkinsonNeil StephensAditya BharadwajDavid DunkerleyHarry RothmanPhillip E. HammondRuth A. WallaceRuth Newbury‐Ecob
- Journals
- New Genetics and Society (5 papers)Health Risk & Society (2 papers)Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFinland
In The Last Decade
Peter Glasner
36 papers receiving 427 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Reproductive Medicine 58
- Physiology 175
- Geography, Planning and Development 23
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 117
- Health 29
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Glasner
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Glasner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Glasner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Glasner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Glasner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Glasner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Glasner. The network helps show where Peter Glasner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Peter Glasner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 5 | Nibelungen - Mythos, Kitsch, Kult | 2008 | 0 |
| 6 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 60 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 14 | Sociomics : locating and analysing proteomics networks on the world wide web | 2005 | 1 |
| 15 | 2001 | 10 | |
| 16 | Genetic Imaginations: Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in Human Genome Research | 1998 | 13 |
| 17 | 1998 | 52 | |
| 18 | 1980 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1978 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 12 |
About Peter Glasner
Peter Glasner is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Physiology and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 40 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (14 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (6 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (5 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (4 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (58 citations), Physiology (175 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (23 citations). Peter Glasner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Paul Atkinson, Neil Stephens, Aditya Bharadwaj, David Dunkerley, Harry Rothman, Phillip E. Hammond, Ruth A. Wallace, Paul Atkinson, Ruth Newbury‐Ecob and Alan W. Black. Their work appears in journals such as New Genetics and Society, Health Risk & Society, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Science and Public Policy and Science as Culture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.