New Genetics and Society

602 papers and 7.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 602 papers published in New Genetics and Society in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations. Papers published in New Genetics and Society usually cover Genetics (201 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (167 papers) and Physiology (129 papers) specifically the topics of Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (127 papers), Race, Genetics, and Society (114 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Genetics and Society are Mike Fortun, Ties van de Werff, Klaus Hoeyer, Brigitte Nerlich, Catherine Waldby, Maurizio Meloni, Brian Salter, Paul Martin, Jane Calvert and Anne Kerr.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in New Genetics and Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New Genetics and Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Genetics and Society.

Countries where authors publish in New Genetics and Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Genetics and Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Genetics and Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Genetics and Society more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025