Countries where authors publish in New Genetics and Society
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Genetics and Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Genetics and Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Genetics and Society more than expected).
Fields of papers published in New Genetics and Society
This network shows the impact of papers published in New Genetics and Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Genetics and Society.
About New Genetics and Society
The 610 papers published in New Genetics and Society in the last decades have received a total of 7.7k indexed citations . Papers published in New Genetics and Society usually cover Reproductive Medicine (84 papers), Genetics (201 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (169 papers) specifically the topics of Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (129 papers), Race, Genetics, and Society (114 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (88 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (75 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (70 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (66 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (46 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Genetics and Society are Mike Fortun, Ties van de Werff, Klaus Hoeyer, Brigitte Nerlich, Anne Kerr, Paul Martin, Brian Salter, Maurizio Meloni, Catherine Waldby and Richard Tutton.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.