Peter Forbes

1.4k citations
32 papers · 935 indexed · h-index 14

Peter Forbes

32 papers receiving 888 citations

Peers

Peter Forbes
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Speech and Hearing 105
  • Clinical Psychology 254
  • Clinical Biochemistry 78
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 181
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 117
Replace Christian Popow with:
Christian Popow Austria
John T. Vessey United States
Gwyneth Rees Australia
Catharyn T. Liverman United States
John Pestian United States
Jiangang Liao United States
Lucien JLPG Engelen Netherlands
Guillaume Fontaine Canada
Robert Furberg United States
Rebecca Holman Netherlands
Peter Forbes relative to Christian Popow Austria Christian Popow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Christian Popow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Forbes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Forbes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Forbes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Forbes. The network helps show where Peter Forbes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Forbes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Forbes Line = papers co-authored together Peter Forbes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20218
2 20213
3 20167
4 201564
5 201410
6 20123
7 201176
8 201058
9 20107
10 200911
11 20096
12 200840
13 200816
14 2007201
15 200635
16
The Gecko’s Foot: How Scientists are Taking a Leaf from Nature's Book
20069
17 200592
18 200529
19 200421
20 200156

About Peter Forbes

Peter Forbes is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Speech and Hearing, Statistics and Probability, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 935 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (105 citations), Clinical Psychology (254 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (78 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (181 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (117 citations). Peter Forbes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ellen J. Wright, Tracy R. G. Gladstone, Mu Zhu, David Wypij, Susan E. Waisbren, Charles J. Homer, Laura E. Peterson, David W. Roberson, Stephen C. Porter and Gabriela Heiden Teló. Their work appears in journals such as The Laryngoscope, Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, Academic Radiology, PEDIATRICS and Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026