Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Local Computations with Probabilities on Graphical Structures and Their Application to Expert Systems
19882.3k citationsSteffen L. Lauritzen et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Steffen L. Lauritzen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Steffen L. Lauritzen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steffen L. Lauritzen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steffen L. Lauritzen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steffen L. Lauritzen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steffen L. Lauritzen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steffen L. Lauritzen. The network helps show where Steffen L. Lauritzen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steffen L. Lauritzen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steffen L. Lauritzen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steffen L. Lauritzen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Steffen L. Lauritzen. Steffen L. Lauritzen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lauritzen, Steffen L.. (2023). Fundamentals of Mathematical Statistics. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).3 indexed citations
2.
Lauritzen, Steffen L.. (2016). Extreme point models in statistics. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 11(2). 65–91.4 indexed citations
Cowell, R. G., et al.. (2013). Analysis of DNA Mixtures with Artefacts. arXiv (Cornell University).7 indexed citations
5.
Lauritzen, Steffen L. & Nicolai Meinshausen. (2012). DISCUSSION: LATENT VARIABLE GRAPHICAL MODEL SELECTION VIA CONVEX OPTIMIZATION.4 indexed citations
6.
Højsgaard, Søren, Steffen L. Lauritzen, & David Edwards. (2012). Graphical Models with R. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).57 indexed citations
Lauritzen, Steffen L.. (2008). Exchangeable Rasch matrices. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.9 indexed citations
11.
Cowell, Robert G., Steffen L. Lauritzen, & Julia Mortera. (2006). MAIES: a tool for DNA mixture analysis. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 90–97.5 indexed citations
12.
Vicard, Paola, A. P. Dawid, Julia Mortera, & Steffen L. Lauritzen. (2004). Estimation of mutation rates from paternity cases using a Bayesian network. Forensic Science International. 2. 9–18.2 indexed citations
Kjærulff, Uffe, et al.. (1995). Hybrid Propagation in Junction Trees. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet).6 indexed citations
16.
Diaconis, Persi, M. L. Eaton, & Steffen L. Lauritzen. (1992). Finite de Finetti theorems in linear models and multivariate analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 19(4). 289–315.45 indexed citations
Lauritzen, Steffen L.. (1975). General Exponential Models for Discrete Observations. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 2. 22–33.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.