Peter Carey
- Accounting top 0.5%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Management Information Systems top 2%
- Hematology top 5%
- Finance top 5%
- Co-authors
- Roger SimnettGeorge TanewskiNava SubramaniamRobyn MoroneyLi LiuBrendan O’ConnellMarshall A. GeigerRobert Blackburn
- Topics
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (24 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (15 papers)Accounting and Organizational Management (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Carey
62 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Accounting 1.5k
- Strategy and Management 596
- Management Information Systems 304
- Hematology 193
- Finance 187
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Carey
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Carey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Carey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Carey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Carey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Carey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Carey. The network helps show where Peter Carey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Carey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Carey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Carey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Carey. Peter Carey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 62 | |
| 4 | Application of the Reporting Entity Concept and Lodgement of Special Purpose Financial Statements | 2 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | VOLUNTARY DEMAND FOR AUDITING BY FARM BUSINESSES: AN AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE | 4 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | Audit Partner Tenure and Audit Quality | 81 |
| 11 | 101 | |
| 12 | 99 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | An empirical investigation into the importance to an internal control structure of human resource practices and policies in the prevention and detection of fraud | 2 |
| 17 | 75 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | ANALYSIS OF SETTLEMENT DATA FROM SAND-DRAINED AREAS | 2 |
About Peter Carey
Peter Carey is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems and Hematology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (24 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (15 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (1.5k citations), Strategy and Management (596 citations) and Management Information Systems (304 citations). Peter Carey has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roger Simnett, George Tanewski, Nava Subramaniam, Robyn Moroney, Li Liu, Brendan O’Connell, Marshall A. Geiger, Robert Blackburn, Wen Guang Qu and M M Reid. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and Journal of Business Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.