V. Wadehra

1.3k total citations
53 papers, 966 citations indexed

About

V. Wadehra is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, V. Wadehra has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 966 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Epidemiology, 14 papers in Surgery and 14 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in V. Wadehra's work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (19 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (7 papers). V. Wadehra is often cited by papers focused on Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (19 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (7 papers). V. Wadehra collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Malaysia. V. Wadehra's co-authors include S M Griffin, K Matthewson, Jennifer Mansfield, Sarah J. Johnson, Thomas W. J. Lennard, Kofi Oppong, J Wayman, Nick Hayes, James A. Henry and Marie E. Mathers and has published in prestigious journals such as Gut, British Journal of Cancer and Thorax.

In The Last Decade

V. Wadehra

50 papers receiving 916 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
V. Wadehra United Kingdom	20	445	361	340	276	100	53	966
Koss Lg United States	16	273 0.6×	243 0.7×	230 0.7×	126 0.5×	62 0.6×	72	930
Camilla J. Cobb United States	16	310 0.7×	165 0.5×	253 0.7×	102 0.4×	170 1.7×	39	892
Felicity Frost Australia	17	234 0.5×	156 0.4×	168 0.5×	174 0.6×	132 1.3×	31	711
Richard M. DeMay United States	19	638 1.4×	322 0.9×	280 0.8×	328 1.2×	766 7.7×	41	1.6k
Anwar Raza United States	13	270 0.6×	189 0.5×	139 0.4×	106 0.4×	159 1.6×	45	632
Mary T. Galgano United States	12	272 0.6×	138 0.4×	212 0.6×	87 0.3×	44 0.4×	14	752
Benjamin L. Witt United States	19	475 1.1×	454 1.3×	341 1.0×	324 1.2×	121 1.2×	66	1.1k
Dinesh Pradhan United States	15	243 0.5×	178 0.5×	191 0.6×	148 0.5×	19 0.2×	57	676
Catherine Devine United States	19	262 0.6×	229 0.6×	171 0.5×	356 1.3×	186 1.9×	53	1.1k
Janet F. Stastny United States	12	201 0.5×	153 0.4×	217 0.6×	128 0.5×	15 0.1×	23	585

Countries citing papers authored by V. Wadehra

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of V. Wadehra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. Wadehra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. Wadehra more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by V. Wadehra

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. Wadehra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. Wadehra. The network helps show where V. Wadehra may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. Wadehra

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. Wadehra. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. Wadehra based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with V. Wadehra. V. Wadehra is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Oppong, Kofi, Muhammad F. Dawwas, Richard Charnley, et al.. (2015). EUS and EUS–FNA diagnosis of suspected pancreatic cystic neoplasms: Is the sum of the parts greater than the CEA?. Pancreatology. 15(5). 531–537. 30 indexed citations

Goodson, M.L., Philip Sloan, V. Wadehra, et al.. (2014). Orcellex brush biopsy and liquid-based cytology -assessment of a new diagnostic technique in oral potentially malignant disorder management. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 3 indexed citations

Carey, Peter, George Chagaluka, Tamiwe Tomoka, et al.. (2014). Remote and rapid pathological diagnosis in a resource challenged unit. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 67(6). 540–543. 16 indexed citations

Murphy, John, et al.. (2013). Anaplastic large cell lymphoma in a reconstructed breast using a silicone implant: A UK case report. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 67(4). 561–563. 20 indexed citations

Oppong, Kofi, et al.. (2011). Utility of cyst fluid CEA cut-off of 192ng/ml in the diagnosis of mucinous cysts of the pancreas. Gut. 60(Suppl 1). A80.2–A80. 1 indexed citations

Roberts, Mark, et al.. (2008). The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia. Cytopathology. 20(6). 359–366. 21 indexed citations

Roberts, Mark, et al.. (2006). Colposcopic management of high‐grade referral smears: a retrospective audit supporting ‘see and treat'?. Cytopathology. 17(6). 339–347. 11 indexed citations

Wadehra, V. & Sarah J. Johnson. (2003). An audit of the positive predictive value of high‐grade dyskaryosis in cervical smears: 2001–2002. Cytopathology. 14(3). 107–114. 4 indexed citations

Mathers, Marie E., Sarah J. Johnson, & V. Wadehra. (2002). How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting glandular neoplasia?. Cytopathology. 13(2). 83–91. 27 indexed citations

10.

Johnson, Sarah J. & V. Wadehra. (2001). How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting invasive squamous cell carcinoma?. Cytopathology. 12(3). 144–150. 5 indexed citations

11.

Naguib, R.N.G., M.S. Lakshmi, V. Wadehra, et al.. (1999). DNA ploidy and cell cycle distribution of breast cancer aspirate cells measured by image cytometry and analyzed by artificial neural networks for their prognostic significance. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine. 3(1). 61–69. 22 indexed citations

12.

Wadehra, V., et al.. (1999). A prospective follow up study of women with colposcopically unconfirmed positive cervical smears. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 106(1). 38–41. 31 indexed citations

13.

Hayes, Nick, et al.. (1999). Peritoneal cytology in the surgical evaluation of gastric carcinoma. British Journal of Cancer. 79(3-4). 520–524. 71 indexed citations

14.

Mansfield, Jennifer, S M Griffin, V. Wadehra, & K Matthewson. (1997). A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures.. Gut. 40(5). 671–677. 174 indexed citations

15.

Cummings, Linda Scott, et al.. (1997). Rapid Screening of Cervical Smears as a Method of Internal Quality Control. Acta Cytologica. 41(2). 251–260. 32 indexed citations

16.

J, Law, et al.. (1996). A Medical Audit and Patient Survey of Hysterectomies Performed for Menstrual Disorders. Scottish Medical Journal. 41(2). 44–46. 5 indexed citations

17.

Johnson, Sarah J., et al.. (1995). An assessment of partial rescreening as an internal quality control method for cervical smears. Cytopathology. 6(6). 376–387. 32 indexed citations

18.

Smith, Edward, et al.. (1994). Borderline nuclear changes in cervical smears: guidelines on their recognition and management. National Coordinating Network (National Cervical Screening Programme), British Society for clinical Cytology, and Royal College of Pathologists' Working Party.. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 47(6). 481–492. 29 indexed citations

19.

Wadehra, V., et al.. (1993). A Retrospective Analysis of 94 Patients With Cin and False Negative Cervical Smears Taken At Colposcopy. Cytopathology. 4(6). 331–337. 13 indexed citations

20.

Davis, J. A., et al.. (1981). A CASE OF CLEAR CELL ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE VAGINA IN PREGNANCY. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 88(3). 322–326. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact