Peter B. Sampson
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Synthesis and biological activity
- Toxicology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics 5
- Co-authors
- John F. Honek (7 shared papers)Mark D. Vaughan (2 shared papers)Brian W. Matthews (1 shared paper)Yan Zhang (1 shared paper)W. Todd Lowther (1 shared paper)Thibaut Crépin (1 shared paper)Emmanuelle Schmitt (1 shared paper)Yves Méchulam (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (5 papers)Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (5 papers)Organic Letters (1 paper)Journal of Molecular Biology (1 paper)Current Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Peter B. Sampson
22 papers receiving 963 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Organic Chemistry 372
- Toxicology 37
- Cell Biology 178
- Oncology 244
- Molecular Biology 464
Countries citing papers authored by Peter B. Sampson
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter B. Sampson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter B. Sampson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter B. Sampson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter B. Sampson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter B. Sampson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter B. Sampson. The network helps show where Peter B. Sampson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter B. Sampson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 157 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 105 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 79 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 69 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 69 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 69 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 55 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 52 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 51 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 16 | 1972 | 19 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 4 |
About Peter B. Sampson
Peter B. Sampson is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (5 papers), 14-3-3 protein interactions (3 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Phenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities (3 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (372 citations), Toxicology (37 citations), Cell Biology (178 citations), Oncology (244 citations) and Molecular Biology (464 citations). Peter B. Sampson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include John F. Honek, Mark D. Vaughan, Brian W. Matthews, Yan Zhang, W. Todd Lowther, Thibaut Crépin, Emmanuelle Schmitt, Yves Méchulam, Sylvain Blanquet and Jeffrey P. Bruce. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Organic Letters, Journal of Molecular Biology and Current Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.