Miklós Fehér

4.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
94 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Miklós Fehér is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Miklós Fehér has authored 94 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Spectroscopy, 30 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 24 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Miklós Fehér's work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (28 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (19 papers) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (15 papers). Miklós Fehér is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (28 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (19 papers) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (15 papers). Miklós Fehér collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Hungary and Canada. Miklós Fehér's co-authors include Jonathan M. Schmidt, Junaid Baber, Tamás Veszprémi, Christopher I. Williams, Philip A. Martin, Tibor Pasinszki, Chris Williams, John M. Dyke, John P. Maier and Paul Labute and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Miklós Fehér

92 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Hit Papers

Property Distributions: Differences between Drugs, Natura... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2002 200 400 600

Peers

Miklós Fehér
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 842
  • Organic Chemistry 617
  • Spectroscopy 557
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 423
Replace Marvin Waldman with:
Marvin Waldman United States
Albérico B. F. da Silva Brazil
D. B. Jack Canada
Erin M. Duffy United States
Pekka Mark Sweden
Hans‐Joachim Böhm Germany
Romano T. Kroemer United Kingdom
Flemming Steen Jørgensen Denmark
Richard H. Henchman United Kingdom
Marvin Waldman United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Miklós Fehér
Miklós Fehér · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Miklós Fehér
Miklós Fehér · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Miklós Fehér

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Miklós Fehér's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miklós Fehér with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miklós Fehér more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Miklós Fehér

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miklós Fehér. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miklós Fehér. The network helps show where Miklós Fehér may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miklós Fehér

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miklós Fehér. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miklós Fehér based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Miklós Fehér. Miklós Fehér is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 58
3 4
4 15
5 33
6 46
7 8
8 7
9 7
10 162
11 84
12 2
13 13
14 3
15 38
16 24
17 14
18 2
19 23
20 24

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026