Pedro Serrador
Impact in
-
- Construction Project Management and Performance
-
- Quality and Supply Management
- Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Papers in
-
- Construction Project Management and Performance 6
-
- Value Engineering and Management 3
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey K. Pinto (1 shared paper)J. Rodney Turner (3 shared papers)Blaize Horner Reich (1 shared paper)Andrew Gemino (1 shared paper)Rodney Turner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Project Management Journal (2 papers)International Journal of Project Management (1 paper)IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (1 paper)Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (1 paper)CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Pedro Serrador
7 papers receiving 750 citations
Pedro Serrador's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Management Science and Operations Research 384
- Management Information Systems 223
- Management of Technology and Innovation 162
- Strategy and Management 219
- Information Systems 305
Countries citing papers authored by Pedro Serrador
This map shows the geographic impact of Pedro Serrador's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pedro Serrador with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pedro Serrador more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pedro Serrador
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pedro Serrador. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pedro Serrador. The network helps show where Pedro Serrador may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Pedro Serrador, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Does Agile work? — A quantitative analysis of agile project success Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 442 |
| 2 | 2015 | 201 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 97 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 7 | Project Planning and Project Success: The 25% Solution | 2014 | 3 |
| 8 | 2015 | 0 |
About Pedro Serrador
Pedro Serrador is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management, Information Systems, Finance and Management Information Systems, having authored 8 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Construction Project Management and Performance (6 papers), Value Engineering and Management (3 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (2 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (2 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (1 paper), BIM and Construction Integration (1 paper) and Technology Assessment and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (384 citations), Management Information Systems (223 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (162 citations), Strategy and Management (219 citations) and Information Systems (305 citations). Pedro Serrador has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey K. Pinto, J. Rodney Turner, Blaize Horner Reich, Andrew Gemino and Rodney Turner. Their work appears in journals such as Project Management Journal, International Journal of Project Management, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences and CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.