Paula Debert

426 total citations
30 papers, 248 citations indexed

About

Paula Debert is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Paula Debert has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 248 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 11 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Paula Debert's work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (20 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (11 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (9 papers). Paula Debert is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral and Psychological Studies (20 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (11 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (9 papers). Paula Debert collaborates with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Norway. Paula Debert's co-authors include William J. McIlvane, María Amélia Matos, Romariz da Silva Barros, Carol Pilgrim, Erik Arntzen, Karen M. Lionello‐Denolf, Caio F. Miguel, Gerson Yukio Tomanari, Anna Carolina Muller Queiroz and Maria Amália Pie Abib Andery and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior and Behavioural Processes.

In The Last Decade

Paula Debert

26 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Paula Debert Brazil 8 221 149 100 23 15 30 248
Russell W. Maguire United States 5 298 1.3× 178 1.2× 100 1.0× 13 0.6× 39 2.6× 11 329
Romariz da Silva Barros Brazil 8 141 0.6× 118 0.8× 36 0.4× 38 1.7× 31 2.1× 55 204
Dawn M. Buffington United States 7 329 1.5× 204 1.4× 106 1.1× 23 1.0× 42 2.8× 10 361
Hannah E. Roome United Kingdom 7 155 0.7× 118 0.8× 128 1.3× 12 0.5× 22 1.5× 16 296
Riikka Lovio Finland 7 200 0.9× 346 2.3× 85 0.8× 12 0.5× 15 1.0× 10 408
Enikő Ladányi United States 8 170 0.8× 238 1.6× 36 0.4× 37 1.6× 11 0.7× 12 309
Shara Brinkley United States 8 233 1.1× 173 1.2× 62 0.6× 11 0.5× 27 1.8× 9 345
Mário Pinto Italy 13 79 0.4× 281 1.9× 168 1.7× 26 1.1× 10 0.7× 32 403
Silvia Bonacina United States 10 110 0.5× 171 1.1× 50 0.5× 13 0.6× 14 0.9× 22 244
Sal A. Soraci United States 12 133 0.6× 230 1.5× 40 0.4× 65 2.8× 11 0.7× 27 323

Countries citing papers authored by Paula Debert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paula Debert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paula Debert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paula Debert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paula Debert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paula Debert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paula Debert. The network helps show where Paula Debert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paula Debert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paula Debert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paula Debert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paula Debert. Paula Debert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2024). Avoidance Extinction in Equivalence Classes. The Psychological Record. 74(1). 1–16. 1 indexed citations
2.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2023). Emparelhamento por identidade com estímulos compostos e o aprendizado de sequências de notas musicais. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento. 19(1).
3.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2022). Revisiting the use of two choices in the matching‐to‐sample procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 118(1). 156–169. 2 indexed citations
4.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2021). Efeito das estruturas de treino na formação de classes de equivalência com o procedimento Go/no-go com estímulos compostos. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento. 17(1).
5.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2020). Estudos de pesquisa básica sobre transferência de extinção e suas implicações para as terapias baseadas em exposição. Acta comportamentalia.. 28(2). 205–221. 1 indexed citations
6.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2020). Transfer of the Avoidance Function in Equivalence Classes Using Loss of Points as the Aversive Stimulus. The Psychological Record. 70(3). 471–479. 11 indexed citations
7.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2016). Transferência de função em classes de equivalência formadas pelo procedimento go/no-go com estímulos compostos. Acta comportamentalia.. 24(3). 315–330. 4 indexed citations
8.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2016). Computational Simulation of Equivalence Class Formation Using the go/no-go Procedure with Compound Stimuli. The Psychological Record. 66(3). 439–449. 11 indexed citations
9.
Debert, Paula & Maria Amália Pie Abib Andery. (2016). DISCRIMINAÇÃO CONDICIONAL: DEFINIÇÕES, PROCEDIMENTOS E DADOS RECENTES. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento. 2(1). 2 indexed citations
10.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2015). Stimulus control in a go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli with pigeons. Behavioural Processes. 115. 30–36. 6 indexed citations
11.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2014). Transfer-of-Function and Novel Emergent Relations Using Simple Discrimination Training Procedures. The Psychological Record. 65(2). 337–346. 9 indexed citations
12.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2013). Go/No-Go Procedure With Compound Stimuli: Effects of Training Structure on the Emergence of Equivalence Classes. The Psychological Record. 63(1). 63–72. 18 indexed citations
13.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2013). ENSINO DE IDEOGRAMAS COM BASE NO PROCEDIMENTO MATCHING DE IDENTIDADE COM ESTÍMULOS COMPOSTOS. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento. 6(2). 203–203. 2 indexed citations
14.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2012). Matching de Identidade com Estímulos Compostose o Ensino de Notas Musicais. Acta comportamentalia.. 20(3). 287–298. 2 indexed citations
15.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2012). Identity-Matching with compound stimuli and musical notes learning. 20(3). 287–298. 1 indexed citations
16.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2011). RELATIONAL DISCRIMINATION BY PIGEONS IN A GO/NO‐GO PROCEDURE WITH COMPOUND STIMULI: A METHODOLOGICAL NOTE. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 96(3). 417–426. 23 indexed citations
17.
Tomanari, Gerson Yukio & Paula Debert. (2010). Apresentação do Dossiê em homenagem à Maria Amelia Matos. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 1 indexed citations
18.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2009). Procedimento go/no-go com estímulos compostos e a emergência de duas classes de equivalência com três estímulos. Acta comportamentalia.. 17(2). 191–210. 6 indexed citations
19.
Debert, Paula, et al.. (2009). EMERGENT CONDITIONAL RELATIONS IN A GO/NO‐GO PROCEDURE: FIGURE—GROUND AND STIMULUS‐POSITION COMPOUND RELATIONS. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 92(2). 233–243. 37 indexed citations
20.
Debert, Paula, María Amélia Matos, & William J. McIlvane. (2007). CONDITIONAL RELATIONS WITH COMPOUND ABSTRACT STIMULI USING A GO/NO‐GO PROCEDURE. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 87(1). 89–96. 76 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026