Paula C. Stacey
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Speech and Hearing top 2%
- Co-authors
- A. Quentin SummerfieldHeather FortnumGarry BartonThom BaguleyAndrew DunnJean UnderwoodStephanie WalkerDerek J. Hoare
- Topics
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (14 papers)Multisensory perception and integration (9 papers)Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers)
- Journals
- Scientific ReportsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesPakistan
In The Last Decade
Paula C. Stacey
26 papers receiving 737 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Cognitive Neuroscience 587
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 211
- Sensory Systems 196
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 180
- Speech and Hearing 179
Countries citing papers authored by Paula C. Stacey
This map shows the geographic impact of Paula C. Stacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paula C. Stacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paula C. Stacey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paula C. Stacey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paula C. Stacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paula C. Stacey. The network helps show where Paula C. Stacey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paula C. Stacey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paula C. Stacey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paula C. Stacey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paula C. Stacey. Paula C. Stacey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | The relationship between eye movements and the McGurk effect when stimuli are presented in noise | 1 |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 68 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 140 | |
| 20 | 70 |
About Paula C. Stacey
Paula C. Stacey is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (9 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (196 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (587 citations) and Speech and Hearing (179 citations). Paula C. Stacey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include A. Quentin Summerfield, Heather Fortnum, Garry Barton, Thom Baguley, Andrew Dunn, Jean Underwood, Stephanie Walker, Derek J. Hoare, Deborah A. Hall and Gerard M. O’Donoghue. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.