Paula C. Stacey

1.1k total citations
27 papers, 763 citations indexed

About

Paula C. Stacey is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Paula C. Stacey has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 763 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 6 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Paula C. Stacey's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (9 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers). Paula C. Stacey is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (9 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers). Paula C. Stacey collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Pakistan. Paula C. Stacey's co-authors include A. Quentin Summerfield, Heather Fortnum, Garry Barton, Thom Baguley, Andrew Dunn, Jean Underwood, Stephanie Walker, Derek J. Hoare, Deborah A. Hall and Gerard M. O’Donoghue and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.

In The Last Decade

Paula C. Stacey

26 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers

Paula C. Stacey
Irina Castellanos United States
Noah H. Silbert United States
Sharon Lesner United States
Jana Besser Netherlands
Joseph Smaldino United States
David B. Hawkins United States
Brent Spehar United States
Kristin J. Van Engen United States
Tonya R. Bergeson United States
Irina Castellanos United States
Paula C. Stacey
Citations per year, relative to Paula C. Stacey Paula C. Stacey (= 1×) peers Irina Castellanos

Countries citing papers authored by Paula C. Stacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paula C. Stacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paula C. Stacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paula C. Stacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paula C. Stacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paula C. Stacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paula C. Stacey. The network helps show where Paula C. Stacey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paula C. Stacey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paula C. Stacey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paula C. Stacey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paula C. Stacey. Paula C. Stacey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davis, Josh P., et al.. (2022). Evaluating earwitness identification procedures: adapting pre-parade instructions and parade procedure. Memory. 31(1). 147–161. 2 indexed citations
2.
Howard, Christina J., et al.. (2020). Audio-visual integration in noise: Influence of auditory and visual stimulus degradation on eye movements and perception of the McGurk effect. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 82(7). 3544–3557. 17 indexed citations
3.
Kitterick, Pádraig T., et al.. (2019). Visual Speech Benefit in Clear and Degraded Speech Depends on the Auditory Intelligibility of the Talker and the Number of Background Talkers. Trends in Hearing. 23. 2760849578–2760849578. 7 indexed citations
4.
Hirst, Rebecca J., et al.. (2018). The threshold for the McGurk effect in audio-visual noise decreases with development. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 12372–12372. 33 indexed citations
5.
Baguley, Thom, et al.. (2018). Forensic voice discrimination by lay listeners: The effect of speech type and background noise on performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 33(2). 272–287. 13 indexed citations
6.
Dunn, Andrew, et al.. (2017). An exploration of the accentuation effect: errors in memory for voice fundamental frequency (F0) and speech rate. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 33(1). 98–110. 1 indexed citations
7.
Mitra, Suvobrata, et al.. (2017). The relationship between eye movements and the McGurk effect when stimuli are presented in noise. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository). 1 indexed citations
8.
Stacey, Paula C., et al.. (2016). The contribution of visual information to the perception of speech in noise with and without informative temporal fine structure. Hearing Research. 336. 17–28. 10 indexed citations
9.
Dunn, Andrew, et al.. (2016). Matching novel face and voice identity using static and dynamic facial images. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 78(3). 868–879. 36 indexed citations
10.
Dunn, Andrew, et al.. (2016). The effect of inserting an inter-stimulus interval in face–voice matching tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 71(2). 424–434. 2 indexed citations
11.
Stacey, Paula C., Thomas Murphy, Christian J. Sumner, Pádraig T. Kitterick, & Katherine L. Roberts. (2014). Searching for a talking face: The effect of degrading the auditory signal.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 40(6). 2106–2111. 3 indexed citations
12.
Stacey, Paula C., et al.. (2010). Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training for adult users of cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology. 49(5). 347–356. 68 indexed citations
13.
Hoare, Derek J., Paula C. Stacey, & Deborah A. Hall. (2010). The Efficacy of Auditory Perceptual Training for Tinnitus: A Systematic Review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 40(3). 313–324. 57 indexed citations
14.
Fortnum, Heather, Paula C. Stacey, Garry Barton, & A. Quentin Summerfield. (2007). National evaluation of support options for deaf and hearing-impaired children: relevance to education services. Deafness & Education International. 9(3). 120–130. 4 indexed citations
15.
Fortnum, Heather, Paula C. Stacey, & A. Quentin Summerfield. (2006). An exploration of demographic bias in a questionnaire survey of hearing-impaired children: Implications for comparisons of children with and without cochlear implants. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 70(12). 2043–2054. 10 indexed citations
16.
Barton, Garry, Paula C. Stacey, Heather Fortnum, & A. Quentin Summerfield. (2006). Hearing-Impaired Children in the United Kingdom, IV: Cost-Effectiveness of Pediatric Cochlear Implantation. Ear and Hearing. 27(5). 575–588. 68 indexed citations
17.
Barton, Garry, Paula C. Stacey, Heather Fortnum, & A. Quentin Summerfield. (2006). Hearing-Impaired Children in the United Kingdom, II: Cochlear Implantation and the Cost of Compulsory Education. Ear and Hearing. 27(2). 187–207. 29 indexed citations
18.
Barton, Garry, Heather Fortnum, Paula C. Stacey, & A. Quentin Summerfield. (2006). Hearing-Impaired Children in the United Kingdom, III: Cochlear Implantation and the Economic Costs Incurred by Families. Ear and Hearing. 27(5). 563–574. 20 indexed citations
19.
Stacey, Paula C., Heather Fortnum, Garry Barton, & A. Quentin Summerfield. (2006). Hearing-Impaired Children in the United Kingdom, I: Auditory Performance, Communication Skills, Educational Achievements, Quality of Life, and Cochlear Implantation. Ear and Hearing. 27(2). 161–186. 140 indexed citations
20.
Stacey, Paula C., Stephanie Walker, & Jean Underwood. (2005). Face processing and familiarity: Evidence from eye‐movement data. British Journal of Psychology. 96(4). 407–422. 70 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026