Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Black Wealth/White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality
1997522 citationsPaul W. Grimes, Thomas M. Shapiro et al.Southern Economic Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Paul W. Grimes
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul W. Grimes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul W. Grimes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul W. Grimes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul W. Grimes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul W. Grimes. The network helps show where Paul W. Grimes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul W. Grimes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul W. Grimes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul W. Grimes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul W. Grimes. Paul W. Grimes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bosshardt, William, et al.. (2011). Teacher workshops chip away at economic illiteracy. The Regional Economist. 15–17.1 indexed citations
5.
Grimes, Paul W., et al.. (2011). Standards for Teaching about the Federal Reserve System: An Initiative by Two Federal Reserve Banks.. Social Education. 75(2).1 indexed citations
6.
Grimes, Paul W., Meghan Millea, & M. Kathleen Thomas. (2010). Testing the Economic Literacy of K-12 Teachers: A State-Wide Baseline Analysis.. American secondary education. 38(3). 4–20.13 indexed citations
7.
Grimes, Paul W., Meghan Millea, & M. Kathleen Thomas. (2008). DISTRICT LEVEL MANDATES AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS' UNDERSTANDING OF ECONOMICS. Journal of economics and economic education research. 9(2). 3.3 indexed citations
8.
Moore, Robert, et al.. (2007). Developing an Intervention Bridging Program for At-Risk Students before the Traditional Pre-Freshman Summer Program. College student journal. 41(1). 151–159.5 indexed citations
9.
Grimes, Paul W.. (2003). A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Academic Dishonesty in High School Economics Classrooms. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
10.
Grimes, Paul W. & Meghan Millea. (2003). Economic education as public policy: the determinants of state-level mandates. Journal of economics and economic education research. 4(2). 3.3 indexed citations
Millea, Meghan & Paul W. Grimes. (2002). Grade Expectations and Student Evaluation of Teaching. College student journal. 36(4). 582.55 indexed citations
13.
Grimes, Paul W., et al.. (2000). Library Use and the Undergraduate Economics Student. College student journal. 34(4). 557.23 indexed citations
Grimes, Paul W., et al.. (1997). Black Wealth/White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. Southern Economic Journal. 63(3). 824–824.522 indexed citations breakdown →
Grimes, Paul W., et al.. (1988). Microcomputer tutorials and student learning in the principles of economics course: an empirical experiment. 6(3). 247–252.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.