Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Solomon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Solomon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Solomon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Solomon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Solomon. The network helps show where Paul Solomon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Solomon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Solomon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Solomon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Solomon. Paul Solomon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Boyer, Stefanie L., et al.. (2015). Word-of-Mouth, Traditional and Covert Marketing: Comparative Studies. Academy of Marketing Studies journal. 19(1). 102.13 indexed citations
3.
Riggle, Robert J., Paul Solomon, & Andrew B. Artis. (2015). THE IMPACT OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT ON SALESPERSON PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL WORK OUTCOMES.3 indexed citations
4.
Solomon, Paul. (2013). The War Hotel. 17(1). 114–116.
Solomon, Paul. (2000). Exploring Structuration in Knowledge Organization: Implications for Managing the Tension Between Stability and Dynamism. Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina). 7. 254–260.5 indexed citations
12.
Solomon, Paul. (1999). Information mosaics: patterns of action that structure. Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina). 150–175.17 indexed citations
13.
Solomon, Paul. (1997). Advances in classification research. Volume 7 : proceedings of the 7th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop : held at the 59th ASIS Annual Meeting, Baltimore, Maryland, October 20, 1996. Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina).1 indexed citations
Solomon, Paul. (1995). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. Information Processing & Management. 31(6). 906–907.504 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Solomon, Paul. (1994). Children, technology, and instruction: A case study of elementary school children using an online catalog (OPAC). Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina). 23(1). 43–51.13 indexed citations
18.
Solomon, Paul. (1992). Information systems for children: explorations in information access and interface usability for an online catalog in an elementary school library. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
Kelly, John & Paul Solomon. (1975). Humor in Television Advertising. Journal of Advertising. 4(3). 31–35.83 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.