Paul Morissette
About
In The Last Decade
Paul Morissette
4 papers receiving 277 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 256
- Cognitive Neuroscience 90
- Social Psychology 85
- Language and Linguistics 47
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 37
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Morissette
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Morissette's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Morissette with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Morissette more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Morissette
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Morissette. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Morissette. The network helps show where Paul Morissette may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Morissette
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Morissette. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Morissette based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Morissette. Paul Morissette is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 101 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | Two perspectives on pointing in infancy. | 82 |
| 4 | 120 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.