Paul M. Gauthier
- Applied Mathematics top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Algebra and Number Theory
- Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Co-authors
- Huaihui ChenПетр Владимирович ПарамоновWalter HengartnerLeon BrownJ. L. WalshLee A. RubelScott GlickmanVassili Nestoridis
- Topics
- Holomorphic and Operator Theory (33 papers)Meromorphic and Entire Functions (21 papers)Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (14 papers)
- Journals
- Annals of MathematicsJournal of Mathematical Analysis and ApplicationsMathematische Annalen
- Partner nations
- CanadaFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Paul M. Gauthier
45 papers receiving 198 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Applied Mathematics 201
- Geometry and Topology 87
- Mathematical Physics 56
- Algebra and Number Theory 30
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 24
Countries citing papers authored by Paul M. Gauthier
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul M. Gauthier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul M. Gauthier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul M. Gauthier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul M. Gauthier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul M. Gauthier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul M. Gauthier. The network helps show where Paul M. Gauthier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul M. Gauthier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul M. Gauthier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul M. Gauthier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul M. Gauthier. Paul M. Gauthier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Paul M. Gauthier
Paul M. Gauthier is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Holomorphic and Operator Theory (33 papers), Meromorphic and Entire Functions (21 papers) and Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (201 citations), Geometry and Topology (87 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (30 citations). Paul M. Gauthier has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Huaihui Chen, Петр Владимирович Парамонов, Walter Hengartner, Leon Brown, J. L. Walsh, Lee A. Rubel, Scott Glickman, Vassili Nestoridis, G. C. Moneti and John F. Brenner. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Mathematics, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications and Mathematische Annalen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.