Thomas Bagby
- Applied Mathematics top 2%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Numerical Analysis top 10%
- Co-authors
- William P. ZiemerN. LevenbergLen BosP. M. GauthierPierre J. BlanchetD. H. ArmitagePaul M. GauthierAurel Cornea
- Topics
- Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (9 papers)Numerical methods in inverse problems (8 papers)Mathematical functions and polynomials (6 papers)
- Journals
- Transactions of the American Mathematical SocietyJournal of Functional AnalysisBulletin of the London Mathematical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Thomas Bagby
21 papers receiving 258 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Applied Mathematics 228
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 117
- Mathematical Physics 91
- Geometry and Topology 76
- Numerical Analysis 71
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bagby
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bagby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bagby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bagby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bagby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bagby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bagby. The network helps show where Thomas Bagby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Bagby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Bagby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Bagby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Bagby. Thomas Bagby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 37 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 48 | |
| 20 | 61 |
About Thomas Bagby
Thomas Bagby is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Applied Mathematics and Numerical Analysis, having authored 21 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (9 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (8 papers) and Mathematical functions and polynomials (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (228 citations), Numerical Analysis (71 citations) and Mathematical Physics (91 citations). Thomas Bagby has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include William P. Ziemer, N. Levenberg, Len Bos, P. M. Gauthier, Pierre J. Blanchet, D. H. Armitage, Paul M. Gauthier, Aurel Cornea and James E. Brennan. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of Functional Analysis and Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.