Paul E. Denis
Impact in
- Physiology top 0.5%
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Papers in
-
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 5
- Co-authors
- Martin Citron (4 shared papers)Robert J. Vassar (4 shared papers)Bruce L. Goode (2 shared papers)Stuart C. Feinstein (2 shared papers)William G. Richards (1 shared paper)Hue T. Kha (1 shared paper)Brad N. Bolon (1 shared paper)Yunhua Gong (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (3 papers)Molecular Biology of the Cell (1 paper)Science (1 paper)Neurobiology of Aging (1 paper)Nature Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Paul E. Denis
8 papers receiving 4.9k citations
Paul E. Denis's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Physiology 3.9k
- Pharmacology 1.4k
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.1k
- Biological Psychiatry 118
- Cell Biology 726
Countries citing papers authored by Paul E. Denis
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul E. Denis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul E. Denis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul E. Denis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul E. Denis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul E. Denis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul E. Denis. The network helps show where Paul E. Denis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul E. Denis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | β-Secretase Cleavage of Alzheimer's Amyloid Precursor Protein by the Transmembrane Aspartic Protease BACE Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 3312 |
| 2 | Mice deficient in BACE1, the Alzheimer's β-secretase, have normal phenotype and abolished β-amyloid generation Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 866 |
| 3 | 1997 | 250 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 239 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 208 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 205 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 1 |
About Paul E. Denis
Paul E. Denis is a scholar working on Physiology, Neurology, Pharmacology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 8 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (1 paper), 14-3-3 protein interactions (1 paper) and Enzyme Production and Characterization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (3.9k citations), Pharmacology (1.4k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.1k citations), Biological Psychiatry (118 citations) and Cell Biology (726 citations). Paul E. Denis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin Citron, Robert J. Vassar, Bruce L. Goode, Stuart C. Feinstein, William G. Richards, Hue T. Kha, Brad N. Bolon, Yunhua Gong, Brian J. Bennett and Jianhua Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Molecular Biology of the Cell, Science, Neurobiology of Aging and Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.