Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis
20082.2k citationsPaul C. Godfrey, Craig Merrill et al.Strategic Management Journalprofile →
The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy And Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective
20052.1k citationsPaul C. GodfreyAcademy of Management Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Paul C. Godfrey
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul C. Godfrey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul C. Godfrey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul C. Godfrey more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul C. Godfrey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul C. Godfrey. The network helps show where Paul C. Godfrey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul C. Godfrey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul C. Godfrey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul C. Godfrey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul C. Godfrey. Paul C. Godfrey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Godfrey, Paul C.. (2020). More than Money. Stanford University Press eBooks.
7.
Godfrey, Paul C. & Ben W. Lewis. (2018). Pragmatism and pluralism: A moral foundation for stakeholder theory in the 21st century. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University).1 indexed citations
8.
Agle, Bradley R., et al.. (2015). Normative Stakeholder Capitalism: Getting from Here to There. Business and Professional Ethics Journal. 34(3). 377–406.1 indexed citations
Godfrey, Paul C., Craig Merrill, & Jared M. Hansen. (2008). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal. 30(4). 425–445.2244 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Godfrey, Paul C.. (2008). What Is Economic Self-Reliance?. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 10(1). 4–7.4 indexed citations
13.
Godfrey, Paul C.. (2008). Editor's Introduction: Social Capital. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 10(2). 2–3.
Godfrey, Paul C.. (2005). The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy And Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective. Academy of Management Review. 30(4). 777–798.2071 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Godfrey, Paul C.. (2002). Corporate Citizenship. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society. 13. 253–260.3 indexed citations
18.
Godfrey, Paul C., et al.. (2000). Working for the common good : concepts and models for service-learning in management.45 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.