Paul Brook

586 citations
15 papers · 349 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Brook

15 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Paul Brook
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Public Administration 93
  • General Health Professions 151
  • Sociology and Political Science 285
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 58
  • Marketing 50
Replace Wouter Zwysen with:
Wouter Zwysen Belgium
Gordon B. Cooke Canada
Olive Robinson United Kingdom
Darren Nixon United Kingdom
Peter Valet Germany
Lorenzo Cini Italy
Juliette Summers United Kingdom
Rosaria Burchielli Australia
Tânia Ferraro Portugal
DeLysa Burnier United States
Paul Brook relative to Wouter Zwysen Belgium Wouter Zwysen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Wouter Zwysen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Brook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Brook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Brook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Brook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Brook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Brook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Brook. The network helps show where Paul Brook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Paul Brook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Brook Line = papers co-authored together Paul Brook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200978
2 200976
3 202066
4 201335
5 202027
6 201321
7 201611
8 20078
9 20116
10 20136
11 20115
12 20174
13 19963
14 20102
15 20101

About Paul Brook

Paul Brook is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations and Urban Studies, having authored 15 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (9 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (4 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (2 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers) and Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (93 citations), General Health Professions (151 citations), Sociology and Political Science (285 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (58 citations) and Marketing (50 citations). Paul Brook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ralph Darlington, Vanessa Beck, Rosemary Lucas, Andreas Wittel, Elke Pioch, Bob S. Carter, Shireen Kanji, Melanie Simms, Andy Danford and Ian Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Work Employment and Society, Culture and Organization, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Economic and Industrial Democracy and Capital & Class.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact