Patrick J. Hurley

33 papers receiving 572 citations

Peers

Patrick J. Hurley
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • General Decision Sciences 45
  • Applied Psychology 95
  • Accounting 85
  • Clinical Psychology 116
  • Safety Research 44
Replace Elisa Gambetti with:
Elisa Gambetti Italy
Maria Anna Donati Italy
Bernardo J. Carducci United States
Keis Ohtsuka Australia
Fiorella Giusberti Italy
Kaileigh A. Byrne United States
Patrik Hansson Sweden
Douglas J. MacPhillamy United States
Georgios A. Bakamitsos United States
Patrick J. Hurley relative to Elisa Gambetti Italy Elisa Gambetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Elisa Gambetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick J. Hurley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick J. Hurley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick J. Hurley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick J. Hurley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick J. Hurley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick J. Hurley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick J. Hurley. The network helps show where Patrick J. Hurley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patrick J. Hurley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick J. Hurley Line = papers co-authored together Patrick J. Hurley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013182
2
A concise introduction to logic
1982135
3 201250
4 201734
5 201527
6 201824
7 202124
8 201317
9 201116
10 201916
11 202310
12 202210
13 196810
14 20137
15 20196
16 20226
17 20244
18 20214
19 20134
20 20213

About Patrick J. Hurley

Patrick J. Hurley is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Accounting, General Decision Sciences and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (7 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (5 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers) and Short Stories in Global Literature (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (45 citations), Applied Psychology (95 citations), Accounting (85 citations), Clinical Psychology (116 citations) and Safety Research (44 citations). Patrick J. Hurley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tracey A Davenport, Louise A. Ellis, Ian B. Hickie, Jane Burns, Philippa Collin, Brian W. Mayhew, D. Eugene Redmond, John D. Elsworth, Dana R. Hermanson and R.H. Roth. Their work appears in journals such as Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory, The Accounting Review, Contemporary Accounting Research, BMC Psychiatry and Cell Transplantation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact