Jane Burns

1.7k citations
31 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Burns

29 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jane Burns
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Applied Psychology 349
  • Clinical Psychology 451
  • Speech and Hearing 100
  • Social Psychology 299
  • Health 114
Replace Kathryn Puskar with:
Kathryn Puskar United States
Linda Trudeau United States
Nicholas Carson United States
Patrick B. Johnson United States
Beate Schrank Austria
Louis Gliksman Canada
Jane Burns Australia
Elizabeth Carpenter–Song United States
Derek Chambers Ireland
L. A. R. Stein United States
Jane Burns relative to Kathryn Puskar United States Kathryn Puskar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kathryn Puskar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Burns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Burns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Burns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Burns. The network helps show where Jane Burns may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Burns, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Burns Line = papers co-authored together Jane Burns links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010183
2 2013182
3 200487
4 200884
5 201762
6 200658
7 200757
8 201250
9
Social Environments and the Emotional Wellbeing of Young People
199845
10 201743
11 200439
12 201439
13 201638
14 201135
15 201127
16 201424
17
Game on: exploring the impact of technologies on young men's mental health and wellbeing
201322
18
Rethinking the Digital Divide: Findings from a Study of Marginalised Young People's ICT Use
200821
19 200815
20 201912

About Jane Burns

Jane Burns is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions and Speech and Hearing, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (11 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (349 citations), Clinical Psychology (451 citations), Speech and Hearing (100 citations), Social Psychology (299 citations) and Health (114 citations). Jane Burns has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ian B. Hickie, Tracey A Davenport, Philippa Collin, Louise A. Ellis, Georgina Luscombe, Danielle Clode, Patrick J. Hurley, Marianne Webb, Michelle Blanchard and Alyssa Milton. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, JMIR Mental Health, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior and Journal of Gambling Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact