Countries where authors publish in Cell Transplantation
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cell Transplantation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cell Transplantation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cell Transplantation more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Cell Transplantation
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cell Transplantation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cell Transplantation.
About Cell Transplantation
The 4.2k papers published in Cell Transplantation in the last decades have received a total of 123.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Cell Transplantation usually cover Developmental Neuroscience (495 papers), Genetics (974 papers), Hepatology (352 papers), Surgery (1.9k papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (675 papers) specifically the topics of Mesenchymal stem cell research (920 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (889 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (557 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (517 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (474 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (459 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (326 papers) and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (314 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cell Transplantation are Shinn‐Zong Lin, Sudha Kadiyala, Dah‐Ching Ding, Carol A. Colton, Woei‐Cherng Shyu, Gianfranco Peluso, Tiziana Squillaro, Umberto Galderisi, Wise Young and Naoya Kobayashi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.