644 total citations 35 papers, 190 citations indexed
About
Patricia Pisters is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Literature and Literary Theory and Cultural Studies.
According to data from OpenAlex, Patricia Pisters has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 190 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 7 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 7 papers in Cultural Studies. Recurrent topics in Patricia Pisters's work include Cinema and Media Studies (17 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers) and Art, Politics, and Modernism (3 papers). Patricia Pisters is often cited by papers focused on Cinema and Media Studies (17 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers) and Art, Politics, and Modernism (3 papers). Patricia Pisters collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Patricia Pisters's co-authors include Rosi Braidotti and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, SubStance and Cinema Journal.
In The Last Decade
Patricia Pisters
23 papers
receiving
133 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Patricia Pisters
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Patricia Pisters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patricia Pisters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patricia Pisters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patricia Pisters
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patricia Pisters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patricia Pisters. The network helps show where Patricia Pisters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patricia Pisters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patricia Pisters.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patricia Pisters based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Patricia Pisters. Patricia Pisters is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pisters, Patricia, et al.. (2015). De beginjaren van de film en de tijd van de avant-garde 1896-1931. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1.1 indexed citations
Pisters, Patricia. (2010). Filming the times of Tangier: nostalgia, postcolonial agency, and preposterous history. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
14.
Pisters, Patricia. (2010). Violence and laughter: paradoxes of nomadic thought in postcolonial cinema. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).2 indexed citations
Pisters, Patricia. (2003). The Matrix of Visual Culture: Working with Deleuze in Film Theory. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).48 indexed citations
18.
Pisters, Patricia. (2001). Micropolitics of Media Culture: Reading the Rhizomes of Deleuze and Guattari. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).10 indexed citations
19.
Pisters, Patricia. (2001). Glamour and glycerine: surplus and residual of the network society. From 'Glamorama' to 'Fight club'. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 125–141.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.