Natasha Kolchevska
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 2%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Annette MichelsonDziga VertovKevin OʼBrienRosalind MarshRichard SṫitesPéter KenézJames L. W. WestAbbott Gleason
- Topics
- Eastern European Communism and Reforms (3 papers)Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (2 papers)Soviet and Russian History (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
Natasha Kolchevska
10 papers receiving 96 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Sociology and Political Science 75
- Economics and Econometrics 67
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 53
- Literature and Literary Theory 38
- Political Science and International Relations 27
Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Kolchevska
This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Kolchevska's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Kolchevska with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Kolchevska more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Kolchevska
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Kolchevska. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Kolchevska. The network helps show where Natasha Kolchevska may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Kolchevska
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Kolchevska. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Kolchevska based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Kolchevska. Natasha Kolchevska is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Most Dangerous Art: Poetry, Politics, and Autobiography after the Russian Revolution | 1 |
| 2 | Angels in the Home and at Work: Russian Women in the Khrushchev Years | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 158 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | Lef and developments in Russian futurism in the 1920's | 0 |
About Natasha Kolchevska
Natasha Kolchevska is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Anthropology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 16 papers that have together received 196 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eastern European Communism and Reforms (3 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (2 papers) and Soviet and Russian History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (53 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (38 citations) and Museology (9 citations). Frequent co-authors include Annette Michelson, Dziga Vertov, Kevin OʼBrien, Rosalind Marsh, Richard Sṫites, Péter Kenéz, James L. W. West, Abbott Gleason, Helena Gościło and Kevin J. O’Brien. Their work appears in journals such as Leonardo, The Slavic and East European Journal and Canadian Slavonic Papers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.