Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A cosmological bound on the invisible axion
19832.0k citationsL. F. Abbott, P. SikiviePhysics Letters Bprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of P. Sikivie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Sikivie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Sikivie more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Sikivie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Sikivie. The network helps show where P. Sikivie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Sikivie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Sikivie.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Sikivie based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P. Sikivie. P. Sikivie is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sikivie, P.. (2024). Axion dark matter. Nuclear Physics B. 1003. 116500–116500.1 indexed citations
Hotz, M., C. Boutan, L. J. Rosenberg, et al.. (2012). Searches for Structured Axion Dark Matter with ADMX. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2012.1 indexed citations
Asztalos, S. J., G. Carosi, C. Hagmann, et al.. (2010). SQUID-Based Microwave Cavity Search for Dark-Matter Axions. Physical Review Letters. 104(4). 41301–41301.436 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Bertone, Gianfranco, Gianfranco Bertone, Gianfranco Bertone, et al.. (2010). Particle Dark Matter. Cambridge University Press eBooks.192 indexed citations
10.
Hotz, M., C. Martin, Richard F. Bradley, et al.. (2010). A Search for Scalar Chameleons with ADMX. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.3 indexed citations
Asztalos, S. J., E. J. Daw, L. J. Rosenberg, et al.. (2001). Large-scale microwave cavity search for dark-matter axions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 64(9).133 indexed citations
14.
Sikivie, P.. (1999). Caustic ring singularity. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 60(6).75 indexed citations
Sikivie, P., et al.. (1994). CASIMIR FORCES BETWEEN BEADS ON STRINGS AND MEMBRANES.1 indexed citations
17.
Sikivie, P.. (1992). Dark matter axions. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 93. 15346.1 indexed citations
18.
Abbott, L. F. & P. Sikivie. (1983). A cosmological bound on the invisible axion. Physics Letters B. 120(1-3). 133–136.1981 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Abbott, L. F., P. Sikivie, & Mark B. Wise. (1980). Constraints on charged-Higgs-boson couplings. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 21(5). 1393–1403.122 indexed citations
20.
Gürsey, Feza & P. Sikivie. (1976). E$sub 7$ as a universal group. Physical Review Letters.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.