J. Clarke

482 total citations
12 papers, 300 citations indexed

About

J. Clarke is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Clarke has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 300 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 3 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 2 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in J. Clarke's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (8 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (6 papers) and Neutrino Physics Research (5 papers). J. Clarke is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (8 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (6 papers) and Neutrino Physics Research (5 papers). J. Clarke collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Japan and Singapore. J. Clarke's co-authors include Raymond R. Volkas, R. Foot, Michael B. Cortie, G. R. Anstis, Michel Bosman, Vicki J. Keast, Yi Cai, Michael A. Schmidt, Tsutomu T. Yanagida and C. Boutan and has published in prestigious journals such as ACS Nano, Physics Letters B and Journal of High Energy Physics.

In The Last Decade

J. Clarke

12 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

J. Clarke

NHEP

AA

EOMM

MC

BE

Hai-Ming Zhang China

Yingru Xu United States

Jiechen Xu China

W. W. Zhang United States

Ming-Wei Li China

A. Şenol Türkiye

Joshua Roth United States

Raniere de Menezes Brazil

Zheng-Tao Wei China

B. S. Yang South Korea

Hai-Ming Zhang China

J. Clarke

158 ×0.6

NHEP

251 ×2.1

AA

8 ×0.3

EOMM

8 ×0.3

MC

9 ×0.4

BE

Citations per year, relative to J. Clarke J. Clarke (= 1×) peers Hai-Ming Zhang

Countries citing papers authored by J. Clarke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Clarke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Clarke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Clarke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Clarke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Clarke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Clarke. The network helps show where J. Clarke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Clarke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Clarke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Clarke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Clarke. J. Clarke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Cai, Yi, J. Clarke, Raymond R. Volkas, & Tsutomu T. Yanagida. (2016). TeV-scale pseudo-Dirac seesaw mechanisms in anE6inspired model. Physical review. D. 94(3). 5 indexed citations

2.

Clarke, J. & Raymond R. Volkas. (2016). Technically natural nonsupersymmetric model of neutrino masses, baryogenesis, the strongCPproblem, and dark matter. Physical review. D. 93(3). 23 indexed citations

3.

Clarke, J. & R. Foot. (2016). Mirror dark matter will be confirmed or excluded by XENON1T. Physics Letters B. 766. 29–34. 9 indexed citations

4.

Clarke, J., R. Foot, & Raymond R. Volkas. (2015). Natural leptogenesis and neutrino masses with two Higgs doublets. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 92(3). 37 indexed citations

5.

Clarke, J., R. Foot, & Raymond R. Volkas. (2015). Electroweak naturalness in the three-flavor type I seesaw model and implications for leptogenesis. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 91(7). 43 indexed citations

6.

Cai, Yi, J. Clarke, Michael A. Schmidt, & Raymond R. Volkas. (2015). Testing radiative neutrino mass models at the LHC. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015(2). 27 indexed citations

7.

Clarke, J.. (2015). Constraining portals with displaced Higgs decay searches at the LHC. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015(10). 10 indexed citations

8.

Clarke, J., R. Foot, & Raymond R. Volkas. (2014). Phenomenology of a very light scalar (100 MeV < m h < 10 GeV) mixing with the SM Higgs. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014(2). 96 indexed citations

9.

Hotz, M., C. Boutan, L. J. Rosenberg, et al.. (2012). Searches for Structured Axion Dark Matter with ADMX. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2012. 1 indexed citations

10.

Clarke, J., R. Foot, & Raymond R. Volkas. (2012). Quark-lepton symmetric model at the LHC. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(7). 3 indexed citations

11.

Bosman, Michel, G. R. Anstis, Vicki J. Keast, J. Clarke, & Michael B. Cortie. (2011). Light Splitting in Nanoporous Gold and Silver. ACS Nano. 6(1). 319–326. 43 indexed citations

12.

Hotz, M., C. Martin, Richard F. Bradley, et al.. (2010). A Search for Scalar Chameleons with ADMX. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact