Acoustics and Ultrasonics

23.5k papers and 520.1k indexed citations i.

About

23.5k papers covering Acoustics and Ultrasonics have received a total of 520.1k indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Random lasers and scattering media, Quantum optics and atomic interactions and Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics and also cover the fields of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Some of the most active scholars covering Acoustics and Ultrasonics are Sajeev John, Diederik S. Wiersma, Ad Lagendijk, Rolf Landauer, Peter W. Barber, Allard P. Mosk, Jeffrey H. Shapiro, Ivo M. Vellekoop, Hui Cao and G. Maret.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Acoustics and Ultrasonics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Acoustics and Ultrasonics.

Countries where authors publish papers about Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Acoustics and Ultrasonics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acoustics and Ultrasonics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025