Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Transparent, Conductive Carbon Nanotube Films
20042.5k citationsZhuangchun Wu, Maria Nikolou et al.profile →
Polaron lattice in highly conducting polyaniline: Theoretical and optical studies
1987768 citationsD. B. Tanner et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Multicolored Electrochromism in Polymers: Structures and Devices
2004708 citationsJungseek Hwang, D. B. Tanner et al.Chemistry of Materialsprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of D. B. Tanner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. B. Tanner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. B. Tanner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. B. Tanner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. B. Tanner. The network helps show where D. B. Tanner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. B. Tanner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. B. Tanner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. B. Tanner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. B. Tanner. D. B. Tanner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Diaz-Ortiz, M., J. R. Gleason, H. Grote, et al.. (2022). Design of the ALPS II optical system. Physics of the Dark Universe. 35. 100968–100968.25 indexed citations
Tanner, D. B., et al.. (2016). A low loss Faraday isolator for squeezed vacuum injection in Advanced LIGO. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2016.1 indexed citations
Ge, Jian, et al.. (2013). Infrared spectroscopy of high purity Si for application in astronomy. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2013.1 indexed citations
7.
Hotz, M., C. Boutan, L. J. Rosenberg, et al.. (2012). Searches for Structured Axion Dark Matter with ADMX. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2012.1 indexed citations
Tanner, D. B. & Karl A. van Bibber. (2010). AXIONS 2010: Proceedings of the International Conference. AIPC. 1274.2 indexed citations
10.
Asztalos, S. J., G. Carosi, C. Hagmann, et al.. (2010). SQUID-Based Microwave Cavity Search for Dark-Matter Axions. Physical Review Letters. 104(4). 41301–41301.436 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Tomlin, Nathan A., John H. Lehman, Katherine E. Hurst, et al.. (2010). Method to determine the absorbance of thin films for photovoltaic technology | NIST. Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.1 indexed citations
12.
Hotz, M., C. Martin, Richard F. Bradley, et al.. (2010). A Search for Scalar Chameleons with ADMX. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.3 indexed citations
Хазанов, Е. А., N. E. Andreev, A. N. Mal’shakov, et al.. (2004). Elimination of thermally induced modal distortions in Faraday isolators for high power laser systems. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 2.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.