Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Publishing quantitative papers with rigor and transparency
2021132 citationsOssi Pesämaa, Ofer Zwikael et al.International Journal of Project Managementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ossi Pesämaa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ossi Pesämaa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ossi Pesämaa more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ossi Pesämaa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ossi Pesämaa. The network helps show where Ossi Pesämaa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ossi Pesämaa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ossi Pesämaa.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ossi Pesämaa based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ossi Pesämaa. Ossi Pesämaa is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bourne, Mike, Marian Bosch‐Rekveldt, & Ossi Pesämaa. (2023). Moving goals and governance in megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management. 41(5). 102486–102486.24 indexed citations
3.
Pesämaa, Ossi, Ofer Zwikael, Joe F. Hair, & Martina Huemann. (2021). Publishing quantitative papers with rigor and transparency. International Journal of Project Management. 39(3). 217–222.132 indexed citations breakdown →
Pesämaa, Ossi, et al.. (2014). Network embeddedness and the survival of start-ups : A census study of Swedish companies founded in 2007. DiVA (Linnaeus University).1 indexed citations
Hansson, Thomas & Ossi Pesämaa. (2012). Curricular Content, Digital Design and Teacher Satisfaction. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2012(1). 605–612.
14.
Pesämaa, Ossi, Sandeep Salunke, & Per Davidsson. (2011). The role of digressive learning and uniqueness on performance: longitudinal evidence from young firms. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
Pesämaa, Ossi, Johan Klæsson, & Antti Haahti. (2008). Board of directors and its effect on performance : the case of Gnosjö region in Sweden. Innovative Marketing. 4(4). 77–85.
Pesämaa, Ossi. (2007). Development of relationships in interorganizational networks: studies in the tourism and construction industries. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Munich University).13 indexed citations
19.
Pesämaa, Ossi, Daniel Örtqvist, & Joseph F. Hair. (2007). It’s all about Trust and Loyalty: Partner Selection Mechanisms in Tourism Networks. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1(2). 12–18.6 indexed citations
20.
Pesämaa, Ossi, et al.. (2007). When collaboration is difficult : The impact of dependencies and lack of Suppliers on small and medium sized firms in a remote area. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 1(2). 6–11.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.