Natalie Purcell

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
44 papers, 814 citations indexed

About

Natalie Purcell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Purcell has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 814 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in General Health Professions, 15 papers in Clinical Psychology and 9 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Natalie Purcell's work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (7 papers). Natalie Purcell is often cited by papers focused on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (7 papers). Natalie Purcell collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Serbia. Natalie Purcell's co-authors include Shira Maguen, Kristine Burkman, Brandon J. Griffin, Craig J. Bryan, Brett T. Litz, Martha Schmitz, Jessica Walsh, Karen H. Seal, Kara Zamora and Christopher J. Koenig and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Medical Care and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Purcell

37 papers receiving 779 citations

Hit Papers

Moral Injury: An Integrative Review 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Purcell United States 13 460 236 190 96 92 44 814
Hilde Pape Norway 17 326 0.7× 358 1.5× 163 0.9× 91 0.9× 23 0.3× 60 1.0k
Landy F. Sparr United States 14 557 1.2× 197 0.8× 148 0.8× 91 0.9× 70 0.8× 37 786
M. Claire Greene United States 16 494 1.1× 415 1.8× 137 0.7× 166 1.7× 31 0.3× 67 943
Peter Huggard New Zealand 13 299 0.7× 402 1.7× 62 0.3× 101 1.1× 39 0.4× 23 668
Franziska Jung Germany 14 469 1.0× 207 0.9× 94 0.5× 137 1.4× 19 0.2× 48 759
Sheila Frankfurt United States 13 588 1.3× 140 0.6× 158 0.8× 114 1.2× 44 0.5× 35 820
James M. Jaranson United States 13 845 1.8× 321 1.4× 425 2.2× 82 0.9× 57 0.6× 23 1.0k
Elizabeth Donnelly Canada 15 434 0.9× 332 1.4× 231 1.2× 81 0.8× 94 1.0× 41 864
Sasha Rudenstine United States 16 505 1.1× 178 0.8× 129 0.7× 148 1.5× 69 0.8× 36 954
Candace Konnert Canada 15 319 0.7× 219 0.9× 161 0.8× 164 1.7× 22 0.2× 37 794

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Purcell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Purcell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Purcell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Purcell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Purcell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Purcell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Purcell. The network helps show where Natalie Purcell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Purcell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Purcell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Purcell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Purcell. Natalie Purcell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
4.
Sellinger, John, Kathryn Gilstad‐Hayden, Christina M. Lazar, et al.. (2024). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on participants in pragmatic clinical trials for chronic pain: implications for trial outcomes and beyond. Pain Medicine. 25(Supplement_1). S17–S27. 2 indexed citations
5.
Seal, Karen H., et al.. (2024). Natural Product Use Among Veterans with Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Study of Attitudes and Communication with Healthcare Providers. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 39(12). 2206–2214.
6.
Holder, Nicholas, Natalie Purcell, Gayle Y. Iwamasa, et al.. (2024). Transitioning into trauma-focused evidence-based psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder from other treatments: a qualitative investigation. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. 54(3). 391–407.
7.
8.
Purcell, Natalie, Beth Ann Petrakis, Karen Anderson Oliver, et al.. (2024). When clinicians and patients disagree on vaccination: what primary care clinicians can learn from COVID-19-vaccine-hesitant patients about communication, trust, and relationships in healthcare. BMC Primary Care. 25(1). 412–412. 2 indexed citations
9.
10.
Griffin, Brandon J., Marcela C. Weber, Jeffrey M. Pyne, et al.. (2023). Toward a Dimensional Contextual Model of Moral Injury: A Scoping Review on Healthcare Workers. Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry. 10(3). 199–216. 19 indexed citations
11.
Carter, Jane, et al.. (2023). Does gender still matter in the pursuit of a career in anaesthesia?. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 52(2). 113–126. 2 indexed citations
12.
Maguen, Shira, Adam Batten, Asale Hubbard, et al.. (2023). Advancing health equity by understanding race disparities and other factors associated with PTSD symptom improvement following evidence-based psychotherapy. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 98. 102747–102747. 4 indexed citations
13.
Denneson, Lauren M., et al.. (2023). Integration of Health Coaches in a Whole Health Team Model of Chronic Pain Care: a Qualitative Study. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 38(16). 3574–3580. 5 indexed citations
14.
Pyne, Jeffrey M., Karen H. Seal, Jennifer K. Manuel, et al.. (2023). Developing and testing a COVID-19 vaccination acceptance intervention: A pragmatic trial comparing vaccine acceptance intervention vs usual care – Rationale, methods, and implementation. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 133. 107325–107325. 2 indexed citations
15.
Manuel, Jennifer K., Natalie Purcell, Linda Abadjian, et al.. (2023). Virtual Worlds Technology to Enhance Training for Primary Care Providers in Assessment and Management of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using Motivational Interviewing: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Medical Education. 9. e42862–e42862. 3 indexed citations
16.
Purcell, Natalie, Mary Geda, Stephen L. Luther, et al.. (2021). Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pragmatic clinical trial participants. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 111. 106619–106619. 14 indexed citations
17.
Purcell, Natalie, et al.. (2020). Tailored to Fit. Medical Care. 58. S80–S87. 7 indexed citations
18.
Purcell, Natalie, Brandon J. Griffin, Kristine Burkman, & Shira Maguen. (2018). “Opening a Door to a New Life”: The Role of Forgiveness in Healing From Moral Injury. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 9. 498–498. 23 indexed citations
19.
Purcell, Natalie. (2009). Feminism and Pornography: Building Sensitive Research and Analytic Approaches. 12(4). 375–380. 2 indexed citations
20.
Purcell, Natalie & Philip J. Beeby. (2009). The influence of skin temperature and skin perfusion on the cephalocaudal progression of jaundice in newborns. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 45(10). 582–586. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026