Olivier Da Costa
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Information Systems and Management top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Romina CachiaPhiline WarnkeCristiano CagninFabiana ScapoloMichaël FriedewaldYves PunieSirkka HeinonenPetteri Alahuhta
- Topics
- Innovation Policy and R&D (2 papers)Regional Development and Policy (2 papers)Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Olivier Da Costa
8 papers receiving 324 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Sociology and Political Science 130
- Global and Planetary Change 56
- Information Systems and Management 51
- Management Science and Operations Research 51
- Strategy and Management 44
Countries citing papers authored by Olivier Da Costa
This map shows the geographic impact of Olivier Da Costa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Olivier Da Costa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Olivier Da Costa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Olivier Da Costa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Olivier Da Costa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Olivier Da Costa. The network helps show where Olivier Da Costa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Olivier Da Costa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Olivier Da Costa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Olivier Da Costa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Olivier Da Costa. Olivier Da Costa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 113 | |
| 2 | 126 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | Indicators on researchers' career and mobility in Europe : a “modelling” approach | 1 |
| 6 | 80 | |
| 7 | Science and Technology Roadmapping for Policy Intelligence: Lessons for Future Projects | 6 |
| 8 | 5 |
About Olivier Da Costa
Olivier Da Costa is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 8 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation Policy and R&D (2 papers), Regional Development and Policy (2 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (16 citations), Information Systems and Management (51 citations) and Communication (41 citations). Olivier Da Costa has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Romina Cachia, Philine Warnke, Cristiano Cagnin, Fabiana Scapolo, Michaël Friedewald, Yves Punie, Sirkka Heinonen, Petteri Alahuhta, Andy Smith and Jacques de Maillard. Their work appears in journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Telematics and Informatics and Technology Analysis and Strategic Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.