Nino B. Cocchiarella
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 3
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- Theoretical Computer Science top 5%
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 14
- Philosophy top 2%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 6
-
- Advanced Algebra and Logic 12
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 15
- Semantic Web and Ontologies 7
- Logic, programming, and type systems 4
- Co-authors
- Daniel Bonevac
- Cited by
- History and Philosophy of ScienceTheoretical Computer ScienceExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nino B. Cocchiarella
38 papers receiving 326 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- History and Philosophy of Science 132
- Theoretical Computer Science 21
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 185
- Philosophy 118
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 82
Countries citing papers authored by Nino B. Cocchiarella
This map shows the geographic impact of Nino B. Cocchiarella's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nino B. Cocchiarella with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nino B. Cocchiarella more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nino B. Cocchiarella
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nino B. Cocchiarella. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nino B. Cocchiarella. The network helps show where Nino B. Cocchiarella may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Nino B. Cocchiarella, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Representing Intentional Objects in Conceptual Realism | 2018 | 0 |
| 2 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 7 | Conceptual Realism and the Nexus of Predication | 2003 | 1 |
| 8 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1985 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 108 | |
| 17 | 1974 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1969 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1969 | 9 | |
| 20 | Tense logic : a study of temporal reference | 1966 | 8 |
About Nino B. Cocchiarella
Nino B. Cocchiarella is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 40 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (12 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (7 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (132 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (21 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (185 citations), Philosophy (118 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (82 citations). Nino B. Cocchiarella has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Bonevac. Their work appears in journals such as Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Noûs, Synthese, Axiomathes and Studia Logica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.